From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: NeilBrown Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2019 09:19:38 +1000 Subject: [lustre-devel] [PATCH 069/151] lustre: ptlrpc: use lu_extent in layout_intent In-Reply-To: References: <1569869810-23848-1-git-send-email-jsimmons@infradead.org> <1569869810-23848-70-git-send-email-jsimmons@infradead.org> <87o8z16t95.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name> Message-ID: <87a7ak6ol1.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org On Tue, Oct 01 2019, James Simmons wrote: >> > From: Jinshan Xiong >> > >> > This way it will be easier to check and print the extent >> > of layout. >> > >> > WC-bug-id: https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-9771 >> > Lustre-commit: c1f450270dda ("LU-9971 ptlrpc: use lu_extent in layout_intent") >> > Signed-off-by: Jinshan Xiong >> > Reviewed-on: https://review.whamcloud.com/29087 >> > Reviewed-by: Lai Siyao >> > Reviewed-by: Bobi Jam >> > Signed-off-by: James Simmons >> > --- >> > include/uapi/linux/lustre/lustre_idl.h | 3 +-- >> > include/uapi/linux/lustre/lustre_user.h | 2 +- >> > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >> >> >> hi James, >> most of this patch is missing - it seems to have been merged into the >> next patch by mistake. >> I'm walking through patches checking that code still compiles after >> each patch, and this one doesn't. >> >> NeilBrown > > Ugh. My tree is on a NFS partition so some times when I apply a patch > while on one node the entire change doesn't show up on another node. > Do you need me to resend the patch? No thanks - I've fixed it up in my tree. Thanks, NeilBrown -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 832 bytes Desc: not available URL: