From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55668) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fdbZS-0008Sv-M6 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 12 Jul 2018 09:23:47 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fdbZN-0006Ti-Or for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 12 Jul 2018 09:23:46 -0400 Received: from mx3-rdu2.redhat.com ([66.187.233.73]:40960 helo=mx1.redhat.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fdbZN-0006T3-Ju for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 12 Jul 2018 09:23:41 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 01F3340122C8 for ; Thu, 12 Jul 2018 13:23:41 +0000 (UTC) From: Markus Armbruster References: <20180704084507.14560-1-peterx@redhat.com> <20180704084507.14560-6-peterx@redhat.com> <87po0023ah.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> <20180706093932.GI23001@xz-mi> <87a7r4zekj.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> <20180710042743.GM23001@xz-mi> <87a7qxgf1c.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2018 15:23:35 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87a7qxgf1c.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> (Markus Armbruster's message of "Thu, 12 Jul 2018 08:10:39 +0200") Message-ID: <87a7qwlh9k.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 5/9] monitor: suspend monitor instead of send CMD_DROP List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: =?utf-8?Q?Marc-Andr=C3=A9?= Lureau Cc: Peter Xu , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" Markus Armbruster writes: > Peter Xu writes: > >> On Fri, Jul 06, 2018 at 03:19:56PM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote: [...] > Marc-Andr=C3=A9, I trust you'll respin the monitor core parts of "[PATCH = v3 > 00/38] RFC: monitor: add asynchronous command type" as a separate series > for 3.1. Please include a patch to rip out the response queue if you > think it's a worthwhile simplification. Our discussion of the response > queue will then be grounded by working patches. I've since (re-)found that respin in my review queue. I even reviewed the patch that rips out the response queue.