From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56790) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ewr0V-0002KJ-AY for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 16 Mar 2018 11:11:00 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ewr0O-0007sj-Sl for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 16 Mar 2018 11:10:59 -0400 Received: from mx3-rdu2.redhat.com ([66.187.233.73]:58720 helo=mx1.redhat.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ewr0O-0007rP-CW for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 16 Mar 2018 11:10:52 -0400 From: Vitaly Kuznetsov References: <20180312151233.16565-1-vkuznets@redhat.com> <20180312151233.16565-2-vkuznets@redhat.com> <435d80c2-ec07-9032-8d07-cac15fc437db@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2018 16:10:42 +0100 In-Reply-To: <435d80c2-ec07-9032-8d07-cac15fc437db@redhat.com> (Paolo Bonzini's message of "Fri, 16 Mar 2018 15:48:02 +0100") Message-ID: <87a7v89hu5.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] i386/kvm: add support for Hyper-V reenlightenment MSRs List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: Richard Henderson , Eduardo Habkost , Marcelo Tosatti , Roman Kagan , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Paolo Bonzini writes: > On 12/03/2018 16:12, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote: [snip] >> @@ -2294,6 +2318,15 @@ static int kvm_get_msrs(X86CPU *cpu) >> env->msr_hv_stimer_count[(index - HV_X64_MSR_STIMER0_COUNT)/2] = >> msrs[i].data; >> break; >> + case HV_X64_MSR_REENLIGHTENMENT_CONTROL: >> + env->msr_hv_reenlightenment_control = msrs[i].data; >> + break; >> + case HV_X64_MSR_TSC_EMULATION_CONTROL: >> + env->msr_hv_tsc_emulation_control = msrs[i].data; >> + break; >> + case HV_X64_MSR_TSC_EMULATION_STATUS: >> + env->msr_hv_tsc_emulation_status = msrs[i].data; >> + break; >> case MSR_MTRRdefType: >> env->mtrr_deftype = msrs[i].data; >> break; >> > > Doesn't this also need a new subsection in target/i386/machine.c? > Actually yes, missed that completely! Thanks! -- Vitaly