From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=none (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=linux.vnet.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.156.1; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=stewart@linux.vnet.ibm.com; receiver=) Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3zVrCg0yWhzDqnh for ; Tue, 30 Jan 2018 13:38:22 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098404.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w0U2cKxl056107 for ; Mon, 29 Jan 2018 21:38:20 -0500 Received: from e13.ny.us.ibm.com (e13.ny.us.ibm.com [129.33.205.203]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2ftdjfmwhf-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Mon, 29 Jan 2018 21:38:19 -0500 Received: from localhost by e13.ny.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Mon, 29 Jan 2018 21:38:18 -0500 Received: from b01cxnp23032.gho.pok.ibm.com (9.57.198.27) by e13.ny.us.ibm.com (146.89.104.200) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; Mon, 29 Jan 2018 21:38:16 -0500 Received: from b01ledav002.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01ledav002.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.199.107]) by b01cxnp23032.gho.pok.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id w0U2cGT941812056; Tue, 30 Jan 2018 02:38:16 GMT Received: from b01ledav002.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDE54124035; Mon, 29 Jan 2018 21:35:04 -0500 (EST) Received: from birb.localdomain (unknown [9.81.201.128]) by b01ledav002.gho.pok.ibm.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 03353124037; Mon, 29 Jan 2018 21:35:03 -0500 (EST) Received: by birb.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 34FA74F0DAB; Tue, 30 Jan 2018 13:38:12 +1100 (AEDT) From: Stewart Smith To: Joel Stanley , OpenBMC Maillist Subject: Re: Removing Barreleye, Firestone, Garrison In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2018 13:38:12 +1100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 18013002-0008-0000-0000-000002C8F6AB X-IBM-SpamModules-Scores: X-IBM-SpamModules-Versions: BY=3.00008451; HX=3.00000241; KW=3.00000007; PH=3.00000004; SC=3.00000248; SDB=6.00982315; UDB=6.00498088; IPR=6.00761597; BA=6.00005799; NDR=6.00000001; ZLA=6.00000005; ZF=6.00000009; ZB=6.00000000; ZP=6.00000000; ZH=6.00000000; ZU=6.00000002; MB=3.00019278; XFM=3.00000015; UTC=2018-01-30 02:38:17 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 18013002-0009-0000-0000-000038160243 Message-Id: <87a7ww136z.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2018-01-30_02:, , signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 impostorscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1709140000 definitions=main-1801300030 X-BeenThere: openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: Development list for OpenBMC List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2018 02:38:23 -0000 Joel Stanley writes: > I am working on ensuring the boards that we build for are working with > the dev-4.13 kernel branch. Currently Barreleye, Firestone and > Garrison systems fail as there has not been a device tree forward > ported. > > Is there an interest in maintaining these platforms? > > If not, I will remove them from CI on Friday to unblock the kernel work. > > This does not stop someone re-enabling them in the near future should > interest arise. However, I suggest we create a policy on removing > abandoned machines when there is no one actively maintaining them, and > we use this to delete machines once they reach the agreed criteria. >From a primarily consumer of OpenBMC perspective, I think it's okay to remove them. Booting the host on Firestone/Garrison with OpenBMC has always been somewhat sketchy. -- Stewart Smith OPAL Architect, IBM.