From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from list by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.71) id 1cyYuf-0003J4-UL for mharc-qemu-trivial@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Apr 2017 03:11:29 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35137) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cyYue-0003IA-Ad for qemu-trivial@nongnu.org; Thu, 13 Apr 2017 03:11:29 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cyYud-0005Is-Mk for qemu-trivial@nongnu.org; Thu, 13 Apr 2017 03:11:28 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:46278) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cyYuZ-0005Gy-Ca; Thu, 13 Apr 2017 03:11:23 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx06.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5DB4BC01B7FC; Thu, 13 Apr 2017 07:11:22 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mx1.redhat.com 5DB4BC01B7FC Authentication-Results: ext-mx08.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: ext-mx08.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=armbru@redhat.com DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mx1.redhat.com 5DB4BC01B7FC Received: from blackfin.pond.sub.org (ovpn-116-81.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.81]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 267A87DED4; Thu, 13 Apr 2017 07:11:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: by blackfin.pond.sub.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9C4D41138646; Thu, 13 Apr 2017 09:11:20 +0200 (CEST) From: Markus Armbruster To: Craig Jellick Cc: "qemu-trivial\@nongnu.org" , "qemu-devel\@nongnu.org" References: <1489765795-32398-1-git-send-email-craig@rancher.com> <871ssz9j8p.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2017 09:11:20 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Craig Jellick's message of "Wed, 12 Apr 2017 16:02:46 +0000") Message-ID: <87a87krdd3.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.16 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.32]); Thu, 13 Apr 2017 07:11:22 +0000 (UTC) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 209.132.183.28 Subject: Re: [Qemu-trivial] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Add 'none' as type for drive's if option X-BeenThere: qemu-trivial@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2017 07:11:29 -0000 Craig Jellick writes: > Is there an action I need to take for that? Fair question. Expect e-mail from a qemu-trivial maintainer that your patch has been merged. If you don't get one within a reasonable time frame, we failed you. Send a reminder as a reply to this message then. I figure one week after 2.10 opens would be reasonable. It's expected to open in a week. Thanks! From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35121) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cyYuc-0003I5-Rv for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 13 Apr 2017 03:11:27 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cyYuZ-0005HQ-It for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 13 Apr 2017 03:11:26 -0400 From: Markus Armbruster References: <1489765795-32398-1-git-send-email-craig@rancher.com> <871ssz9j8p.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2017 09:11:20 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Craig Jellick's message of "Wed, 12 Apr 2017 16:02:46 +0000") Message-ID: <87a87krdd3.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Add 'none' as type for drive's if option List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Craig Jellick Cc: "qemu-trivial@nongnu.org" , "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" Craig Jellick writes: > Is there an action I need to take for that? Fair question. Expect e-mail from a qemu-trivial maintainer that your patch has been merged. If you don't get one within a reasonable time frame, we failed you. Send a reminder as a reply to this message then. I figure one week after 2.10 opens would be reasonable. It's expected to open in a week. Thanks!