From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40451) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c5W4H-0006Ct-3y for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 12 Nov 2016 06:01:53 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c5W4E-0004D1-0K for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 12 Nov 2016 06:01:53 -0500 Received: from mail-wm0-x229.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c09::229]:37227) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c5W4D-0004CY-Iu for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 12 Nov 2016 06:01:49 -0500 Received: by mail-wm0-x229.google.com with SMTP id t79so20338092wmt.0 for ; Sat, 12 Nov 2016 03:01:49 -0800 (PST) References: <1468881010-27229-1-git-send-email-mst@redhat.com> <20160719014441-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com> <20161111171804.GA17480@flamenco> <20161111231705.GA10295@pxdev.xzpeter.org> <20161112020454.GA25696@flamenco> From: Alex =?utf-8?Q?Benn=C3=A9e?= In-reply-to: <20161112020454.GA25696@flamenco> Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2016 11:01:46 +0000 Message-ID: <87a8d59d2d.fsf@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 22/55] q35: ioapic: add support for emulated IOAPIC IR List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "Emilio G. Cota" Cc: Peter Xu , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Peter Maydell , Richard Henderson , Eduardo Habkost , Paolo Bonzini Emilio G. Cota writes: > On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 18:17:05 -0500, Peter Xu wrote: >> I also tried to test with exactly the same build parameters with the >> previous commit of above (09cd058a2c, "intel_iommu: get rid of {0} >> initializers"), it has the same problem (TCG version cannot boot guest >> kernel if I provide a disk as parameter). > > Hmm that's interesting, on my end 09cd05^ works well 100% of the time > w/ TCG. > >> Do we still support gthread as coroutine backend? And to what extend >> do we support it? > > I don't know :( That's why I sent the message. > > I'll investigate further. We would like to drop it but tsan only works with it at the moment. We are exploring what it would take to support the other setcontext/longjmp backends in tsan, see: Message-ID: <871t8kwygw.fsf@linaro.org> On the thread-sanitizer mailing list. If we can get it working then we can drop QEMU's gthread backend. -- Alex Bennée