From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3rpPmG1Nj8zDqyX for ; Tue, 12 Jul 2016 11:40:13 +1000 (AEST) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098414.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.11/8.16.0.11) with SMTP id u6C1Y24p141538 for ; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 21:40:11 -0400 Received: from e36.co.us.ibm.com (e36.co.us.ibm.com [32.97.110.154]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 243eucygwm-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 21:40:10 -0400 Received: from localhost by e36.co.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 19:40:10 -0600 Received: from d03dlp03.boulder.ibm.com (9.17.202.179) by e36.co.us.ibm.com (192.168.1.136) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 19:40:07 -0600 X-IBM-Helo: d03dlp03.boulder.ibm.com X-IBM-MailFrom: stewart@linux.vnet.ibm.com Received: from b03cxnp08025.gho.boulder.ibm.com (b03cxnp08025.gho.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.130.17]) by d03dlp03.boulder.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E60219D8051; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 19:39:43 -0600 (MDT) Received: from b03ledav003.gho.boulder.ibm.com (b03ledav003.gho.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.130.234]) by b03cxnp08025.gho.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id u6C1e65B41615570; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 18:40:06 -0700 Received: from b03ledav003.gho.boulder.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85EFB6A043; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 19:40:06 -0600 (MDT) Received: from birb.localdomain (unknown [9.81.193.179]) by b03ledav003.gho.boulder.ibm.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 367BB6A03C; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 19:40:05 -0600 (MDT) Received: by birb.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 65AED229DB30; Tue, 12 Jul 2016 11:39:59 +1000 (AEST) From: Stewart Smith To: Patrick Williams , Joel Stanley Cc: OpenBMC Maillist , OpenBMC Patches , skiboot list Subject: Re: [PATCH openbmc 3/3] meta-openpower: Update pflash version In-Reply-To: <20160711215731.GB12483@asimov.austin.ibm.com> References: <20160630162033.2330-1-openbmc-patches@stwcx.xyz> <20160630162033.2330-4-openbmc-patches@stwcx.xyz> <20160630212709.GV20922@asimov.austin.ibm.com> <20160711215731.GB12483@asimov.austin.ibm.com> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.21+24~gbceb651 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/25.0.94.1 (x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2016 11:39:59 +1000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Content-Scanned: Fidelis XPS MAILER x-cbid: 16071201-0020-0000-0000-0000094C8965 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 16071201-0021-0000-0000-00005399D24D Message-Id: <87a8hnskgg.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2016-07-12_01:, , signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1604210000 definitions=main-1607120014 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 12 Jul 2016 20:09:33 +1000 X-BeenThere: openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Development list for OpenBMC List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2016 01:40:14 -0000 Patrick Williams writes: > Stewart, > > Bump. Didn't see a reply from you on this. Thanks, I somehow missed it. > On Fri, Jul 01, 2016 at 10:23:24AM +0930, Joel Stanley wrote: >> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 6:57 AM, Patrick Williams wrote: >> > On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 11:20:33AM -0500, OpenBMC Patches wrote: >> >> From: Joel Stanley >> >> >> >> Move to HEAD so we can drop the patches we carry. >> >> >> >> Signed-off-by: Joel Stanley >> > >> > Stewart released 5.2.3 with these fixes. Can you put us onto that >> > instead? Prefer to stay on a released version rather than a commit. >> >> It was my intention to bump us to 5.2.3. However, I went and looked at >> the recipe and we were carrying 7 patches against skiboot. Only the >> 7th is on the stable branch. >> >> Stewart, >> >> I assume you don't want to tag master at all? >> >> If not, can you please pull this list of commits into the stable branch: >> >> e42206bf0729782330778e77283af2aca23499dc >> 7c7911eb7bea505474c3062bf5b0c60d99b502a5 >> e5fc583e610d4360f8fe50f225c868cb3019c1a7 >> e415b3b9bf0441745f442e12bfce25ed49c589bf >> 45e548176e16ad8ba9540fcd75131ba4993e42b7 >> 24ae270984a37525f8393eeccbd0ac55da4503e1 >> >> They are all related to building pflash. Done. Also cherry picked 2ebc0ae0a2c61c006062ba42fc253296060c34cf as it had Fixes:e42206bf0729782330778e77283af2aca23499dc in it. I can tag a 5.2.4 with these bits in it today if you like too. -- Stewart Smith OPAL Architect, IBM.