From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: Promoting Git developers
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 10:20:34 +0100
Message-ID: <87a8zdguxp.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <CAP8UFD1+rC0FjisSddDcyn1E_75wtBU9pEpUcQX5zNtd4zKYFQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<54FDA6B5.8050505@drmicha.warpmail.net>
	<CAP8UFD0KNbPBB_dOzw_dAj+ws190_cO8g7_jb_V33x1jxgvnqQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<xmqqk2yo22ce.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com>
	<CAP8UFD37v_zOjRkUPLy-ChDs=+NetsDY7Q14-4rYA-WhnTRYyA@mail.gmail.com>
	<xmqqfv9b5krc.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com>
	<CAP8UFD2ba3jQSsQrGGWM-8HTfGR+zZhmbkxiEBhSR+Ho=B0MuA@mail.gmail.com>
	<xmqqvbi1sy4h.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com>
	<003001d05f71$81845160$848cf420$@nexbridge.com>
	<CAP8UFD08xoJ2H8XgfDbPfHddX9YFpFgbrY+PZ5Tphuot7JwGvw@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Cc: "Randall S. Becker" <rsbecker@nexbridge.com>,
	Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
	Michael J Gruber <git@drmicha.warpmail.net>,
	git <git@vger.kernel.org>, Jeff King <peff@peff.net>,
	Scott Chacon <schacon@gmail.com>
To: Christian Couder <christian.couder@gmail.com>
X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Mar 16 10:20:46 2015
Return-path: <git-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org
Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67])
	by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <git-owner@vger.kernel.org>)
	id 1YXRCX-0004H9-I8
	for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Mon, 16 Mar 2015 10:20:45 +0100
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1752711AbbCPJUk (ORCPT <rfc822;gcvg-git-2@m.gmane.org>);
	Mon, 16 Mar 2015 05:20:40 -0400
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:42822 "EHLO
	fencepost.gnu.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1753631AbbCPJUg (ORCPT <rfc822;git@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 16 Mar 2015 05:20:36 -0400
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41861 helo=lola)
	by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <dak@gnu.org>)
	id 1YXRCN-0003Dj-7I; Mon, 16 Mar 2015 05:20:35 -0400
Received: by lola (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id D00CBE0470; Mon, 16 Mar 2015 10:20:34 +0100 (CET)
In-Reply-To: <CAP8UFD08xoJ2H8XgfDbPfHddX9YFpFgbrY+PZ5Tphuot7JwGvw@mail.gmail.com>
	(Christian Couder's message of "Mon, 16 Mar 2015 10:10:28 +0100")
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux)
Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <git.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/265552>

Christian Couder <christian.couder@gmail.com> writes:

> On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 11:43 PM, Randall S. Becker
> <rsbecker@nexbridge.com> wrote:
>>> On March 15, 2015 6:19 PM Christian Couder wrote:
>> <snip>
>>> Just one suggestion on the name and half a comment.
>>>
>>> How would "Git Review" (or "Git Monthly Review", or replace your favourite
>>> "how-often-per-period-ly" in its name) sound?  I meant it to sound similar
>> to
>>> academic journals that summarize and review contemporary works in the
>> field
>>> and keeps your original "pun" about our culture around "patch reviews".
>
> I would be ok for that but there is already this Gerrit related command:
>
> http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Gerrit/git-review
>
> Maybe I can just use "Git Rev", but it doesn't tell that it is about news?
>
>> If I may humbly offer the suggestion that "Git Blame" would be a far more
>> appropriate pun as a name :)
>
> You don't want me to steal Junio's blog title:
>
> http://git-blame.blogspot.fr/
>
> don't you?

"Git Annotate"?

-- 
David Kastrup