From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37363) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XlCIy-0000P2-3M for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 03 Nov 2014 02:44:04 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XlCIr-0006uM-UY for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 03 Nov 2014 02:44:00 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:56967) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XlCIr-0006uH-N0 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 03 Nov 2014 02:43:53 -0500 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id sA37hrVC021317 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Mon, 3 Nov 2014 02:43:53 -0500 From: Markus Armbruster References: <1414487352-6027-1-git-send-email-kraxel@redhat.com> <20141102111413.GA1836@redhat.com> <1414998658.8686.1.camel@nilsson.home.kraxel.org> Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2014 08:43:50 +0100 In-Reply-To: <1414998658.8686.1.camel@nilsson.home.kraxel.org> (Gerd Hoffmann's message of "Mon, 03 Nov 2014 08:10:58 +0100") Message-ID: <87a9483f0p.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] vga: demote cirrus List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Gerd Hoffmann Cc: ajax@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Michael S. Tsirkin" Gerd Hoffmann writes: > On So, 2014-11-02 at 13:14 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >> On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 10:09:10AM +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > Time to flip the default to stdvga. Done for 2.2+ machine types only, >> > for obvious compatibility reasons. >> > >> > https://www.kraxel.org/blog/2014/10/qemu-using-cirrus-considered-harmful/ >> >> Would you classify this a bugfix? If not, this missed soft freeze >> deadline, so should be deferred to 2.3? > > Given that cirrus simply can't meet todays graphics needs I think this > can be classified as bugfix. And as we don't add something new but just > flip the default to something more sane I don't expect any stability > issues from adding this post freeze. No need for semantic games as far as I'm concerned. We should be serious about soft freeze, but not dogmatic.