From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Vincent Bernat Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix "ip -6 route add ... nexthop" Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2012 19:53:46 +0200 Message-ID: <87a9x3vxzp.fsf@guybrush.luffy.cx> References: <1346952649-5716-1-git-send-email-bernat@luffy.cx> <1346952649-5716-2-git-send-email-bernat@luffy.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE To: netdev@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from bart.luffy.cx ([78.47.78.131]:54280 "EHLO bart.luffy.cx" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932654Ab2IFSBM convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Sep 2012 14:01:12 -0400 Received: from bart.luffy.cx (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bart.luffy.cx (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB56014203 for ; Thu, 6 Sep 2012 19:53:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: from guybrush.luffy.cx (nat-bureautique.net.b1.fti.net [193.252.118.2]) by bart.luffy.cx (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 712EC14127 for ; Thu, 6 Sep 2012 19:53:48 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <1346952649-5716-2-git-send-email-bernat@luffy.cx> (Vincent Bernat's message of "Thu, 6 Sep 2012 19:30:49 +0200") Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: =E2=9D=A6 6 septembre 2012 19:30 CEST, Vincent Bernat =C2=A0: > IPv6 multipath routes were not accepted by "ip route" because an IPv4 > address was expected for each gateway. Use `get_addr()` instead of > `get_addr32()`. Well, looking at the kernel, I have just discovered that there is no support for IPv6 multipath. This explains a lot of things for me and this patch is therefore useless (but could still be applied for future purposes?). --=20 panic("CPU too expensive - making holiday in the ANDES!"); 2.2.16 /usr/src/linux/arch/mips/kernel/traps.c