From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kevin Hilman Subject: Re: PM: Summary of changes for v3.6 Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2012 17:18:02 -0700 Message-ID: <87a9yn74ud.fsf@ti.com> References: <201207162246.03660.rjw@sisk.pl> <87mx2zcq62.fsf@ti.com> <201207172252.06093.rjw@sisk.pl> <500791B2.9010601@kernel.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from na3sys009aog117.obsmtp.com ([74.125.149.242]:46252 "EHLO na3sys009aog117.obsmtp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751816Ab2GZASF (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Jul 2012 20:18:05 -0400 Received: by pbbro8 with SMTP id ro8so2388656pbb.11 for ; Wed, 25 Jul 2012 17:18:03 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <500791B2.9010601@kernel.org> (Len Brown's message of "Thu, 19 Jul 2012 00:48:50 -0400") Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Len Brown Cc: Colin Cross , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Daniel Lezcano , LKML , Linux PM list , ACPI Devel Mailing List , Alan Stern Len Brown writes: >> The disappeared from Len's tree for a little while after the 3.5 merge >> window, which is why they started appearing other places. Now that >> they have returned to Len's tree, hopefully to stay, they should be >> considered the official version. > > Yes, they are staged for 3.6 in my tree. > > The intent was to push them for 3.5, but some unrelated patches > exploded and stopped that push. I then had to re-merge my tree > to push only the bug-fixes to 3.5, which is why the feature > patches went away for a bit. Great, thanks for clarifying. Kevin