From: Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org>
To: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Cc: tytso@mit.edu
Subject: [PATCH] ext4: Add more sanity checks V2
Date: Thu, 03 Jun 2010 14:17:24 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87aarc1kuj.fsf@openvz.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1274959061-8043-1-git-send-email-dmonakhov@openvz.org> (Dmitry Monakhov's message of "Thu, 27 May 2010 15:17:41 +0400")
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 363 bytes --]
Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org> writes:
> - It is reasonable to return EIO from ext4_remove_blocks() if extent is
> incorrect.
> - Check that reservation counters are consistent at the on inode drop.
Please ignore old version, and take a look in to new version instead.
Changes from v1:
Perform self-consistency checks for all counters on final put.
[-- Attachment #2: 0001-ext4-Add-more-sanity-checks-v2.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 3877 bytes --]
>From ef9fe639882499b42e78d53e7ee7b013d656813f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org>
Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2010 13:53:37 +0400
Subject: [PATCH] ext4: Add more sanity checks v2
- It is reasonable to return EIO from ext4_remove_blocks() if extent is
incorrect.
- Check that reservation counters are self-consistent.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org>
---
fs/ext4/extents.c | 13 +++++--------
fs/ext4/super.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
2 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/extents.c b/fs/ext4/extents.c
index e3cc230..c39cb39 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/extents.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/extents.c
@@ -2189,14 +2189,11 @@ static int ext4_remove_blocks(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
start = ext_pblock(ex) + ee_len - num;
ext_debug("free last %u blocks starting %llu\n", num, start);
ext4_free_blocks(handle, inode, 0, start, num, flags);
- } else if (from == le32_to_cpu(ex->ee_block)
- && to <= le32_to_cpu(ex->ee_block) + ee_len - 1) {
- printk(KERN_INFO "strange request: removal %u-%u from %u:%u\n",
- from, to, le32_to_cpu(ex->ee_block), ee_len);
- } else {
- printk(KERN_INFO "strange request: removal(2) "
- "%u-%u from %u:%u\n",
- from, to, le32_to_cpu(ex->ee_block), ee_len);
+ } else {
+ EXT4_ERROR_INODE(inode, "strange request: removal %u-%u from"
+ " %u:%u\n", from, to,
+ le32_to_cpu(ex->ee_block), ee_len);
+ return -EIO;
}
return 0;
}
diff --git a/fs/ext4/super.c b/fs/ext4/super.c
index 49d88c0..2b072c9 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/super.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/super.c
@@ -40,6 +40,7 @@
#include <linux/log2.h>
#include <linux/crc16.h>
#include <asm/uaccess.h>
+#include <linux/stringify.h>
#include "ext4.h"
#include "ext4_jbd2.h"
@@ -640,6 +641,18 @@ static void dump_orphan_list(struct super_block *sb, struct ext4_sb_info *sbi)
}
}
+#define CHECK_COUNTER(sb, counter, val) \
+ do { \
+ if (percpu_counter_sum_positive(&EXT4_SB(sb)->counter) != \
+ (s64)(val)) \
+ ext4_warning((sb), "Counter %s contain unexpected " \
+ "value %lld, expected %lld\n", \
+ __stringify(counter), \
+ percpu_counter_sum_positive( \
+ &EXT4_SB(sb)->counter), \
+ (s64)(val)); \
+ } while(0);
+
static void ext4_put_super(struct super_block *sb)
{
struct ext4_sb_info *sbi = EXT4_SB(sb);
@@ -677,6 +690,11 @@ static void ext4_put_super(struct super_block *sb)
}
kobject_del(&sbi->s_kobj);
+ CHECK_COUNTER(sb, s_dirs_counter, ext4_count_dirs(sb));
+ CHECK_COUNTER(sb, s_dirtyblocks_counter, 0UL);
+ CHECK_COUNTER(sb, s_freeblocks_counter, ext4_count_free_blocks(sb));
+ CHECK_COUNTER(sb, s_freeinodes_counter, ext4_count_free_inodes(sb));
+
for (i = 0; i < sbi->s_gdb_count; i++)
brelse(sbi->s_group_desc[i]);
kfree(sbi->s_group_desc);
@@ -770,7 +788,7 @@ static struct inode *ext4_alloc_inode(struct super_block *sb)
static void ext4_destroy_inode(struct inode *inode)
{
- if (!list_empty(&(EXT4_I(inode)->i_orphan))) {
+ if (unlikely(!list_empty(&(EXT4_I(inode)->i_orphan)))) {
ext4_msg(inode->i_sb, KERN_ERR,
"Inode %lu (%p): orphan list check failed!",
inode->i_ino, EXT4_I(inode));
@@ -779,6 +797,18 @@ static void ext4_destroy_inode(struct inode *inode)
true);
dump_stack();
}
+ if (unlikely(EXT4_I(inode)->i_reserved_data_blocks) ||
+ EXT4_I(inode)->i_reserved_meta_blocks ||
+ EXT4_I(inode)->i_allocated_meta_blocks) {
+ ext4_msg(inode->i_sb, KERN_ERR, "Inode %lu (%p): Destroyed"
+ " inode still has reserved blocks and probably would"
+ " leak, rsv_data=%u, rsv_mdata=%u, alloc_mblk=%u",
+ inode->i_ino, EXT4_I(inode),
+ EXT4_I(inode)->i_reserved_data_blocks,
+ EXT4_I(inode)->i_reserved_meta_blocks,
+ EXT4_I(inode)->i_allocated_meta_blocks);
+ dump_stack();
+ }
kmem_cache_free(ext4_inode_cachep, EXT4_I(inode));
}
--
1.6.6.1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-06-03 10:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-27 11:17 [PATCH] ext4: Add more sanity checks Dmitry Monakhov
2010-06-03 10:17 ` Dmitry Monakhov [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87aarc1kuj.fsf@openvz.org \
--to=dmonakhov@openvz.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.