From: Elias Oltmanns <eo@nebensachen.de>
To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] ide: ide_hwgroup_t.rq doesn't need an ide_lock held
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 10:34:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87abdcg86j.fsf@denkblock.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20081008203002.19112.519.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com> wrote:
> From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
> Subject: [PATCH] ide: ide_hwgroup_t.rq doesn't need an ide_lock held
>
> While at it:
> - no need to check for hwgroup presence in ide_dump_opcode()
>
> Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
> ---
[...]
> Index: b/drivers/ide/ide-io.c
> ===================================================================
> --- a/drivers/ide/ide-io.c
> +++ b/drivers/ide/ide-io.c
[...]
> @@ -274,7 +269,11 @@ static void ide_complete_pm_request (ide
> drive->dev_flags &= ~IDE_DFLAG_BLOCKED;
> blk_start_queue(drive->queue);
> }
> - HWGROUP(drive)->rq = NULL;
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ide_lock, flags);
> +
> + drive->hwif->hwgroup->rq = NULL;
> +
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&ide_lock, flags);
> if (__blk_end_request(rq, 0, 0))
> BUG();
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ide_lock, flags);
Is it really an improvement to release the lock here?
Regards,
Elias
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-10 8:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-08 20:29 [PATCH 0/7] ide: locking improvements Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-10-08 20:29 ` [PATCH 1/7] ide: unify ide_intr()'s exit points Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-10-08 20:29 ` [PATCH 2/7] ide: IDE settings don't need an ide_lock held Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-10-08 20:29 ` [PATCH 3/7] ide: __ide_port_unregister_devices() doesn't " Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-10-08 20:30 ` [PATCH 4/7] ide: ide_hwgroup_t.rq " Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-10-10 8:34 ` Elias Oltmanns [this message]
2008-10-10 9:01 ` Jens Axboe
2008-10-10 9:37 ` Elias Oltmanns
2008-10-10 10:17 ` Jens Axboe
2008-10-10 16:20 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-10-08 20:30 ` [PATCH 5/7] ide: push ide_lock to __ide_end_request() Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-10-08 20:30 ` [PATCH 6/7] ide: ide_lock + __blk_end_request() -> blk_end_request() Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-10-08 20:30 ` [PATCH 7/7] ide: use queue lock instead of ide_lock when possible Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-10-10 8:43 ` Elias Oltmanns
2008-10-10 8:52 ` Jens Axboe
2008-10-10 11:35 ` Jens Axboe
2008-10-09 6:51 ` [PATCH 0/7] ide: locking improvements Jens Axboe
2008-10-09 8:36 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-10-09 8:40 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87abdcg86j.fsf@denkblock.local \
--to=eo@nebensachen.de \
--cc=bzolnier@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.