From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.43) id 1GCZ9C-0005Qq-FP for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Aug 2006 05:54:14 -0400 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GCZ9A-0005Pk-BE for grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Aug 2006 05:54:12 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GCZ98-0005Or-7U for grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Aug 2006 05:54:11 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GCZ98-0005Oo-1K for grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Aug 2006 05:54:10 -0400 Received: from [195.54.107.70] (helo=mxfep01.bredband.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GCZEu-00027Z-A2 for grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Aug 2006 06:00:08 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain ([213.113.223.229] [213.113.223.229]) by mxfep01.bredband.com with ESMTP id <20060814095408.UVNS5813.mxfep01.bredband.com@localhost.localdomain>; Mon, 14 Aug 2006 11:54:08 +0200 From: Johan Rydberg To: The development of GRUB 2 References: <87lkpszn0s.wl%jeroen@vrijschrift.org> <1155487746.18244.2.camel@diesel> <87k65cze97.wl%jeroen@vrijschrift.org> <1155498700.18244.12.camel@diesel> <87irkwz9e3.wl%jeroen@vrijschrift.org> <1155510374.18244.17.camel@diesel> <87lkprzxji.fsf@xs4all.nl> Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 12:09:54 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87lkprzxji.fsf@xs4all.nl> (Marco Gerards's message of "Mon, 14 Aug 2006 07:38:57 +0200") Message-ID: <87ac67iq6l.fsf@night.trouble.net> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Subject: Re: moving away from CVS X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GRUB 2 List-Id: The development of GRUB 2 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 09:54:12 -0000 Marco Gerards writes: >> I agree; I think there are far better replacements for CVS. Personally I >> would highly recommend mercurial, but I suppose everybody has their own >> preferences. I noticed that Savannah, where the GRUB tree is currently >> hosted, offers subversion support... > > I like subversion because it solves most problems, while I do not have > to learn something new. Subversion still does not track merges, which I think was the original reason to why this discussion started. Personally I would rather use bzr, but I know our maintainer does not like it that much (because of the lack of commit hooks.) But I wouldn't mind switching to subversion, keep in mind that it will not be any better than CVS. ~j