From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ms.lwn.net (ms.lwn.net [45.79.88.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E7F725EFBF; Mon, 18 Aug 2025 16:46:54 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1755535616; cv=none; b=j+RV/h/dWctLH7swqXjDwHSIByouE6pxU3j9aNhXPyOq4h92UaVr9cOZ3hmcds2aPu4RnR9HpWRxvIfnHHSW05AYQCab+HRP7pSPk1HZdyaXCBHlT8woJum7YJbfunvEN859gef9CUvHT/j+Ty0yBAfxrXO5I3iVa3urZ7ntJNc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1755535616; c=relaxed/simple; bh=JeOgJPKPhlMM+v9nS1Rcs3P9Jhb7OnLeXhQkmAmW7/g=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=h/Wm+ijC/ACNdE0htd5DvpTiEd2MzphdOabPSVwuCbTZPr6jMIqWc79z/Fp3HR8KHoO18TKeohzVHdYa5jhgXDMWP5BSPF8ZIf8xw3GJrlMUrZagbbrsl+rAtiK1ZJEcyFnER2kKGgQb4bo+t96tnyJ2t48HV6ZrPxtT1athEbc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b=EeuEBVtC; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b="EeuEBVtC" DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 ms.lwn.net 293C840AB4 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lwn.net; s=20201203; t=1755535614; bh=eS3VlHL5nEkglHH12GEGXdT6zm/VZKMW+fKKXPIqxEQ=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=EeuEBVtCRz7ejt7MEOTpnXH1VAkxqyfVkLzOcgqDXvEaJwsUTikh2R/mUbblicGwh 2T2lU6hrHSOLFoazvj6uuNdCDINGjEvfpvBWn/u5uB6d1d+AIIo8eS//tpLZjh55GS MCsG35L42WzxZXABwAFRNROzPLQSGQ1WhonE2UpaQ2/nofb8zqEiHlmBaxHYVead/K iYpOT+R5k2Q3ll3HX83Dj2eoPtYJP+PmX+XWxJ0OWAoKkbryXom1P4OpkkpfvWOn1Y qtktr7116zS9IgsT7iH1dxcXuEiHpv79kvAnuCOFMB/SrOK9ZvaO4OgT6+7X0eWSZw 457VvFR0uUkVQ== Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2601:280:4600:2da9::1fe]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 293C840AB4; Mon, 18 Aug 2025 16:46:54 +0000 (UTC) From: Jonathan Corbet To: David Sterba , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Cc: Ondrej Mosnacek , Paul Moore , selinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, David Sterba Subject: Re: [PATCH] docs: Remove remainders of reiserfs In-Reply-To: <20250813100053.1291961-1-dsterba@suse.com> References: <20250813100053.1291961-1-dsterba@suse.com> Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2025 10:46:53 -0600 Message-ID: <87bjoc8tmq.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain David Sterba writes: > Reiserfs has been removed in 6.13, there are still some mentions in the > documentation about it and the tools. Remove those that don't seem > relevant anymore but keep references to reiserfs' r5 hash used by some > code. > > There's one change in a script scripts/selinux/install_policy.sh but it > does not seem to be relevant either. > > Signed-off-by: David Sterba > --- > Documentation/admin-guide/ext4.rst | 2 +- > Documentation/admin-guide/laptops/laptop-mode.rst | 8 ++++---- > .../arch/powerpc/eeh-pci-error-recovery.rst | 1 - > .../translations/it_IT/process/changes.rst | 14 -------------- > fs/btrfs/tree-log.c | 2 +- > scripts/selinux/install_policy.sh | 2 +- > 6 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-) It seems there is more that could be done here, but I have applied this as a step forward. Thanks, jon