Re: Selective lei filters and replies to old threads

["Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@redhat.com>]

Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> writes:

> On Fri, Aug 18, 2023 at 08:02:34PM +0200, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
>> Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> writes:
>> 
>> > On Thu, Aug 17, 2023 at 04:15:54PM +0200, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
>> >> [0] Side note: if anyone has a nice trick to specifically exclude Greg's
>> >> stable patch bombs from this, I would be interested in hearing about
>> >> that as well :)
>> >
>> > I thought those stable patch bombs had a X- header on them, like:
>> > 	X-stable: review
>> > and
>> > 	X-Patchwork-Hint: ignore
>> > but somehow it looks like I'm only adding that to the first message in
>> > the stable-patch-bomb series.
>> >
>> > Would it help for me to fix my side and add those headers to make it
>> > easier for you to be able to ignore them?
>> 
>> I don't think it's possible to match on arbitrary headers in Lore
>> searches (maybe public-inbox could be taught that?), but it would
>> certainly aid in adding local filtering after fetching which would work
>> for me as a workaround. So yes, please! :)
>
> Turned out my scripts were broken, and the header I was supposed to be
> putting on all stable patches was no longer happening (something changed
> in git format-patch's output I think.)
>
> So this should be now fixed up with the latest 5.10.192-rc1 announcement
> and emails.

Yup, I see the tags - great, I'll set up some filters. Thanks! :)

-Toke