From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 4/8] drm/i915/vdsc: Add function to read any PPS register
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2023 13:17:38 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87bkey5agt.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230822060240.413101-5-suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
On Tue, 22 Aug 2023, Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com> wrote:
> Add function to read any PPS register based on the
> intel_dsc_pps enum provided. Add a function which will call the
> new pps read function and place it in crtc state. Only PPS0 and
> PPS1 are readout the rest of the registers will be read in upcoming
> patches.
>
> --v2
> -Changes in read function as PPS enum is removed
> -Initialize pps_val as 0 in pps_read func itself [Jani]
> -Create a function that gets the required register and call that
> in the common read function [Jani]
> -Move the drm_WARN_ON one abstraction layer above [Jani]
>
> --v3
> -Send both reg values regardless of dsc engine no [Jani]
> -Don't use num_vdsc_instances stick to dsc_split field [Ankit]
>
> --v4
> -Manipulate the reg values instead of creating MACRO to change
> name of pps [Ankit]
>
> --v5
> -Read dsc reg values using array rather than individual variables
> [Ankit]
> -Loop the verification of all dsc engine reads to future proof it
> [Ankit]
> -Keep the fix me comment in this patch and remove it in later one
> where we add other readouts [Ankit]
> -Add switch statement that fills in the required registers based on
> no of vdsc engines per pipe.
>
> --v7
> -Pass no of vdsc instances from read_reg function [Ankit]
> -Fix issue where arrays do not get freed on return for read_and_verify
> func [Ankit]
>
> --v8
> -Simplify reading and verifying of register and remove dynamically
> allocated arrays [Jani]
> -Remove no_ from no_vdsc_per_pipe and wherever else it applies [Ankit]
>
> --v9
> -change variable name to dsc_reg_size rather than vdsc_per_pipe [Ankit]
>
> Signed-off-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vdsc.c | 118 ++++++++++++------
> .../gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vdsc_regs.h | 12 ++
> 2 files changed, 94 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vdsc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vdsc.c
> index fbe8ce9fe1ab..d505fa971dff 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vdsc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vdsc.c
> @@ -371,6 +371,28 @@ int intel_dsc_get_num_vdsc_instances(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> return num_vdsc_instances;
> }
>
> +static void intel_dsc_get_pps_reg(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state, int pps,
> + i915_reg_t *dsc_reg, int dsc_reg_size)
> +{
> + struct intel_crtc *crtc = to_intel_crtc(crtc_state->uapi.crtc);
> + enum transcoder cpu_transcoder = crtc_state->cpu_transcoder;
> + enum pipe pipe = crtc->pipe;
> + bool pipe_dsc;
> +
> + pipe_dsc = is_pipe_dsc(crtc, cpu_transcoder);
> +
> + switch (dsc_reg_size) {
dsc_reg_size is the size of the dsc_reg array, nothing more, nothing
else. You just have to ensure you don't overflow it.
It'll always be 2 here.
This function should get as many registers as indicated by
intel_dsc_get_vdsc_per_pipe(crtc_state), but limited by dsc_reg_size.
> + case 2:
> + dsc_reg[1] = pipe_dsc ? ICL_DSC1_PPS_REG(pipe, pps) : DSCC_PPS_REG(pps);
> + fallthrough;
> + case 1:
> + dsc_reg[0] = pipe_dsc ? ICL_DSC0_PPS_REG(pipe, pps) : DSCA_PPS_REG(pps);
> + break;
> + default:
> + MISSING_CASE(dsc_reg_size);
> + }
> +}
> +
> static void intel_dsc_pps_configure(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> {
> struct intel_crtc *crtc = to_intel_crtc(crtc_state->uapi.crtc);
> @@ -1000,17 +1022,72 @@ void intel_dsc_disable(const struct intel_crtc_state *old_crtc_state)
> }
> }
>
> +static bool intel_dsc_read_pps_reg(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> + int pps, u32 *pps_val)
> +{
> + struct intel_crtc *crtc = to_intel_crtc(crtc_state->uapi.crtc);
> + struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(crtc->base.dev);
> + const int vdsc_per_pipe = intel_dsc_get_vdsc_per_pipe(crtc_state);
> + i915_reg_t dsc_reg[2];
> + int i;
> +
> + *pps_val = 0;
> + drm_WARN_ON_ONCE(&i915->drm, ARRAY_SIZE(dsc_reg) < vdsc_per_pipe);
> +
> + intel_dsc_get_pps_reg(crtc_state, pps, dsc_reg, ARRAY_SIZE(dsc_reg));
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < min_t(int, ARRAY_SIZE(dsc_reg), vdsc_per_pipe); i++) {
> + u32 pps_temp;
> +
> + pps_temp = intel_de_read(i915, dsc_reg[i]);
> +
> + if (i == 0)
> + *pps_val = intel_de_read(i915, dsc_reg[i]);
I actually took the trouble of re-writing this for loop for you [1]. Why
would you change it to duplicate the read here? I just don't understand.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/87jztv9tri.fsf@intel.com
> + else if (pps_temp != *pps_val)
> + return false;
> + }
> +
> + return true;
> +}
> +
> +static void intel_dsc_read_and_verify_pps_reg(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> + int pps, u32 *pps_val)
> +{
> + struct intel_crtc *crtc = to_intel_crtc(crtc_state->uapi.crtc);
> + struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(crtc->base.dev);
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = intel_dsc_read_pps_reg(crtc_state, pps, pps_val);
> + drm_WARN_ON(&i915->drm, !ret);
> +}
> +
> +static void intel_dsc_get_pps_config(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> +{
> + struct drm_dsc_config *vdsc_cfg = &crtc_state->dsc.config;
> + u32 pps_temp1, pps_temp2;
> +
> + /* FIXME: add more state readout as needed */
> +
> + /* Readout PPS_0 and PPS_1 registers */
> + intel_dsc_read_and_verify_pps_reg(crtc_state, 0, &pps_temp1);
> + intel_dsc_read_and_verify_pps_reg(crtc_state, 1, &pps_temp2);
> +
> + vdsc_cfg->bits_per_pixel = pps_temp2;
> +
> + if (pps_temp1 & DSC_NATIVE_420_ENABLE)
> + vdsc_cfg->bits_per_pixel >>= 1;
> +
> + crtc_state->dsc.compressed_bpp = vdsc_cfg->bits_per_pixel >> 4;
> +}
> +
> void intel_dsc_get_config(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> {
> struct intel_crtc *crtc = to_intel_crtc(crtc_state->uapi.crtc);
> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(crtc->base.dev);
> - struct drm_dsc_config *vdsc_cfg = &crtc_state->dsc.config;
> enum transcoder cpu_transcoder = crtc_state->cpu_transcoder;
> - enum pipe pipe = crtc->pipe;
> enum intel_display_power_domain power_domain;
> intel_wakeref_t wakeref;
> - u32 dss_ctl1, dss_ctl2, pps0 = 0, pps1 = 0, pps_temp0, pps_temp1;
> - int vdsc_instances_per_pipe;
> + u32 dss_ctl1, dss_ctl2;
>
> if (!intel_dsc_source_support(crtc_state))
> return;
> @@ -1031,38 +1108,7 @@ void intel_dsc_get_config(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> crtc_state->dsc.dsc_split = (dss_ctl2 & RIGHT_BRANCH_VDSC_ENABLE) &&
> (dss_ctl1 & JOINER_ENABLE);
>
> - /* FIXME: add more state readout as needed */
> -
> - vdsc_instances_per_pipe = intel_dsc_get_vdsc_per_pipe(crtc_state);
> -
> - /* PPS0 & PPS1 */
> - if (!is_pipe_dsc(crtc, cpu_transcoder)) {
> - pps1 = intel_de_read(dev_priv, DSCA_PICTURE_PARAMETER_SET_1);
> - if (vdsc_instances_per_pipe > 1) {
> - pps_temp1 = intel_de_read(dev_priv, DSCC_PICTURE_PARAMETER_SET_1);
> - drm_WARN_ON(&dev_priv->drm, pps1 != pps_temp1);
> - }
> - } else {
> - pps0 = intel_de_read(dev_priv,
> - ICL_DSC0_PICTURE_PARAMETER_SET_0(pipe));
> - pps1 = intel_de_read(dev_priv,
> - ICL_DSC0_PICTURE_PARAMETER_SET_1(pipe));
> - if (vdsc_instances_per_pipe > 1) {
> - pps_temp0 = intel_de_read(dev_priv,
> - ICL_DSC1_PICTURE_PARAMETER_SET_0(pipe));
> - pps_temp1 = intel_de_read(dev_priv,
> - ICL_DSC1_PICTURE_PARAMETER_SET_1(pipe));
> - drm_WARN_ON(&dev_priv->drm, pps0 != pps_temp0);
> - drm_WARN_ON(&dev_priv->drm, pps1 != pps_temp1);
> - }
> - }
> -
> - vdsc_cfg->bits_per_pixel = pps1;
> -
> - if (pps0 & DSC_NATIVE_420_ENABLE)
> - vdsc_cfg->bits_per_pixel >>= 1;
> -
> - crtc_state->dsc.compressed_bpp = vdsc_cfg->bits_per_pixel >> 4;
> + intel_dsc_get_pps_config(crtc_state);
> out:
> intel_display_power_put(dev_priv, power_domain, wakeref);
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vdsc_regs.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vdsc_regs.h
> index 785ede31116e..862dc708c5fc 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vdsc_regs.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vdsc_regs.h
> @@ -78,6 +78,10 @@
> /* Icelake Display Stream Compression Registers */
> #define DSCA_PICTURE_PARAMETER_SET_0 _MMIO(0x6B200)
> #define DSCC_PICTURE_PARAMETER_SET_0 _MMIO(0x6BA00)
> +#define DSCA_PPS_0 0x6B200
> +#define DSCC_PPS_0 0x6BA00
These aren't, and should not be, used directly, so please prefix them
with _ i.e. DSCA_PPS_0.
> +#define DSCA_PPS_REG(pps) _MMIO(DSCA_PPS_0 + (pps) * 4)
> +#define DSCC_PPS_REG(pps) _MMIO(DSCC_PPS_0 + (pps) * 4)
Register macros should never have _REG suffix.
> #define _ICL_DSC0_PICTURE_PARAMETER_SET_0_PB 0x78270
> #define _ICL_DSC1_PICTURE_PARAMETER_SET_0_PB 0x78370
> #define _ICL_DSC0_PICTURE_PARAMETER_SET_0_PC 0x78470
> @@ -88,6 +92,14 @@
> #define ICL_DSC1_PICTURE_PARAMETER_SET_0(pipe) _MMIO_PIPE((pipe) - PIPE_B, \
> _ICL_DSC1_PICTURE_PARAMETER_SET_0_PB, \
> _ICL_DSC1_PICTURE_PARAMETER_SET_0_PC)
> +#define ICL_DSC0_PPS_0(pipe) _PICK_EVEN((pipe) - PIPE_B, \
> + _ICL_DSC0_PICTURE_PARAMETER_SET_0_PB, \
> + _ICL_DSC0_PICTURE_PARAMETER_SET_0_PC)
> +#define ICL_DSC1_PPS_0(pipe) _PICK_EVEN((pipe) - PIPE_B, \
> + _ICL_DSC1_PICTURE_PARAMETER_SET_0_PB, \
> + _ICL_DSC1_PICTURE_PARAMETER_SET_0_PC)
Ditto about _ prefix.
> +#define ICL_DSC0_PPS_REG(pipe, pps) _MMIO(ICL_DSC0_PPS_0(pipe) + ((pps) * 4))
> +#define ICL_DSC1_PPS_REG(pipe, pps) _MMIO(ICL_DSC1_PPS_0(pipe) + ((pps) * 4))
Ditto about _REG suffix.
> #define DSC_NATIVE_422_ENABLE BIT(23)
> #define DSC_NATIVE_420_ENABLE BIT(22)
> #define DSC_ALT_ICH_SEL (1 << 20)
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-23 10:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-22 6:02 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 0/8] Add DSC PPS readout Suraj Kandpal
2023-08-22 6:02 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 1/8] drm/i915/vdsc: Refactor dsc register field macro Suraj Kandpal
2023-08-22 6:02 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 2/8] drm/i915/vdsc: Add a check for dsc split cases Suraj Kandpal
2023-08-22 6:02 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 3/8] drm/i915/vdsc: Add func to get no. of vdsc instances per pipe Suraj Kandpal
2023-08-22 6:02 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 4/8] drm/i915/vdsc: Add function to read any PPS register Suraj Kandpal
2023-08-23 7:14 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2023-08-23 7:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v10 " Suraj Kandpal
2023-08-23 10:17 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2023-08-22 6:02 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 5/8] drm/i915/vdsc: Add function to write in " Suraj Kandpal
2023-08-22 6:02 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 6/8] drm/i915/vdsc: Remove unused dsc registers Suraj Kandpal
2023-08-22 6:02 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 7/8] drm/i915/vdsc: Fill the intel_dsc_get_pps_config function Suraj Kandpal
2023-08-22 6:02 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v9 8/8] drm/i915/display: Compare the readout dsc pps params Suraj Kandpal
2023-08-22 6:54 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Add DSC PPS readout (rev9) Patchwork
2023-08-22 6:54 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2023-08-22 7:13 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2023-08-22 11:42 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2023-08-22 13:03 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2023-08-23 7:20 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success " Patchwork
2023-08-23 9:35 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Add DSC PPS readout (rev10) Patchwork
2023-08-23 9:35 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2023-08-23 9:57 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87bkey5agt.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=suraj.kandpal@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.