Re: Future of icount discussion for next KVM call?

[Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>]

Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com> writes:

> Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org> wrote:
>> (replying all because qemu-devel rejected my email again)
>>
>> On Thu, 16 Feb 2023 at 10:19, Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Juan,
>>>
>>> Do we have an agenda for next weeks KVM call yet? If there is space I'd
>>> like to take some time to discuss the future direction of icount.
>
> For next week we have:
> - more single binary qemu (philippe?)
> - TDX migration from intel.
>   We asked them on the previous call to change their design to transfer
>   stuff through migration channels and not create a new channel.  But I
>   haven't heard from intel. (wei?)
>   They agreed to send the slides and post the code before continue
>   discussion.
>
> And now I like the title of you topic
>
> - Future Direction of icount
>
> O:-)
>
> So, I will recommend 20 minutes each if Wei shows up, or 30/30 for the
> rest.
>
> What do the rest of the people think.

I think we either need fewer topics per call (ideally one), or strictly
enforced time limits per topic.  I don't fancy meetings where the topic
that made me attend falls off the end.

The former may necessitate more frequent calls.