From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@kernel.org>
To: Heiko Thiery <heiko.thiery@gmail.com>
Cc: Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Ajay.Kathat@microchip.com, Claudiu.Beznea@microchip.com,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
Amisha.Patel@microchip.com, Thomas Haller <thaller@redhat.com>,
Beniamino Galvani <bgalvani@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: wilc1000 MAC address is 00:00:00:00:00:00
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2023 11:25:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87bkm1x47n.fsf@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAEyMn7bpwusVarzHa262maJHf6XTpCW4SL0-o+YH4DGZx94+hw@mail.gmail.com> (Heiko Thiery's message of "Fri, 10 Feb 2023 10:17:24 +0100")
Heiko Thiery <heiko.thiery@gmail.com> writes:
> HI,
>
> Am Do., 9. Feb. 2023 um 22:19 Uhr schrieb Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>:
>>
>> Am 2023-02-09 22:07, schrieb Jakub Kicinski:
>> > On Thu, 9 Feb 2023 18:51:58 +0000 Ajay.Kathat@microchip.com wrote:
>> >> > netdev should be created with a valid lladdr, is there something
>> >> > wifi-specific here that'd prevalent that? The canonical flow is
>> >> > to this before registering the netdev:
>> >>
>> >> Here it's the timing in wilc1000 by when the MAC address is available
>> >> to
>> >> read from NV. NV read is available in "mac_open" net_device_ops
>> >> instead
>> >> of bus probe function. I think, mostly the operations on netdev which
>> >> make use of mac address are performed after the "mac_open" (I may be
>> >> missing something).
>> >>
>> >> Does it make sense to assign a random address in probe and later read
>> >> back from NV in mac_open to make use of stored value?
>> >
>> > Hard to say, I'd suspect that may be even more confusing than
>> > starting with zeroes. There aren't any hard rules around the
>> > addresses AFAIK, but addrs are visible to user space. So user
>> > space will likely make assumptions based on the most commonly
>> > observed sequence (reading real addr at probe).
>>
>> Maybe we should also ask the NetworkManager guys. IMHO random
>> MAC address sounds bogus.
>
> Maybe it would be a "workaround" with loading the firmware while
> probing the device to set the real hw address.
>
> probe()
> load_fw()
> read_hw_addr_from_nv()
> eth_hw_addr_set(ndev, addr)
> unload_fw()
>
> mac_open()
> load_fw()
>
> mac_close()
> unload_fw()
This is exactly what many wireless drivers already do and I recommend
that wilc1000 would do the same.
--
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-10 9:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-08 14:24 wilc1000 MAC address is 00:00:00:00:00:00 Heiko Thiery
2023-02-09 17:15 ` Ajay.Kathat
2023-02-09 17:48 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-02-09 18:51 ` Ajay.Kathat
2023-02-09 21:07 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-02-09 21:19 ` Michael Walle
2023-02-10 9:17 ` Heiko Thiery
2023-02-10 9:25 ` Kalle Valo [this message]
2023-02-10 19:12 ` Ajay.Kathat
2023-02-10 21:28 ` Dan Williams
2023-02-15 20:14 ` Johannes Berg
2023-02-23 10:44 ` Heiko Thiery
2023-02-23 21:48 ` Ajay.Kathat
2023-02-09 18:40 ` Heiko Thiery
2023-02-09 19:09 ` Ajay.Kathat
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87bkm1x47n.fsf@kernel.org \
--to=kvalo@kernel.org \
--cc=Ajay.Kathat@microchip.com \
--cc=Amisha.Patel@microchip.com \
--cc=Claudiu.Beznea@microchip.com \
--cc=bgalvani@redhat.com \
--cc=heiko.thiery@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michael@walle.cc \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=thaller@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.