All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
	Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Reiji Watanabe <reijiw@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/10] KVM: x86: Mark all registers as avail/dirty at vCPU creation
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2021 15:40:42 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87bl4m9hd1.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210921000303.400537-2-seanjc@google.com>

Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> writes:

> Mark all registers as available and dirty at vCPU creation, as the vCPU has
> obviously not been loaded into hardware, let alone been given the chance to
> be modified in hardware.  On SVM, reading from "uninitialized" hardware is
> a non-issue as VMCBs are zero allocated (thus not truly uninitialized) and
> hardware does not allow for arbitrary field encoding schemes.
>
> On VMX, backing memory for VMCSes is also zero allocated, but true
> initialization of the VMCS _technically_ requires VMWRITEs, as the VMX
> architectural specification technically allows CPU implementations to
> encode fields with arbitrary schemes.  E.g. a CPU could theoretically store
> the inverted value of every field, which would result in VMREAD to a
> zero-allocated field returns all ones.
>
> In practice, only the AR_BYTES fields are known to be manipulated by
> hardware during VMREAD/VMREAD; no known hardware or VMM (for nested VMX)
> does fancy encoding of cacheable field values (CR0, CR3, CR4, etc...).  In
> other words, this is technically a bug fix, but practically speakings it's
> a glorified nop.

Just to make the picture complete, according to TLFS, Enlightened VMCS
must also be zero allocated and the encoding is known. Still a nop ;-)

>
> Failure to mark registers as available has been a lurking bug for quite
> some time.  The original register caching supported only GPRs (+RIP, which
> is kinda sorta a GPR), with the masks initialized at ->vcpu_reset().  That
> worked because the two cacheable registers, RIP and RSP, are generally
> speaking not read as side effects in other flows.
>
> Arguably, commit aff48baa34c0 ("KVM: Fetch guest cr3 from hardware on
> demand") was the first instance of failure to mark regs available.  While
> _just_ marking CR3 available during vCPU creation wouldn't have fixed the
> VMREAD from an uninitialized VMCS bug because ept_update_paging_mode_cr0()
> unconditionally read vmcs.GUEST_CR3, marking CR3 _and_ intentionally not
> reading GUEST_CR3 when it's available would have avoided VMREAD to a
> technically-uninitialized VMCS.
>
> Fixes: aff48baa34c0 ("KVM: Fetch guest cr3 from hardware on demand")
> Fixes: 6de4f3ada40b ("KVM: Cache pdptrs")
> Fixes: 6de12732c42c ("KVM: VMX: Optimize vmx_get_rflags()")
> Fixes: 2fb92db1ec08 ("KVM: VMX: Cache vmcs segment fields")
> Fixes: bd31fe495d0d ("KVM: VMX: Add proper cache tracking for CR0")
> Fixes: f98c1e77127d ("KVM: VMX: Add proper cache tracking for CR4")
> Fixes: 5addc235199f ("KVM: VMX: Cache vmcs.EXIT_QUALIFICATION using arch avail_reg flags")
> Fixes: 8791585837f6 ("KVM: VMX: Cache vmcs.EXIT_INTR_INFO using arch avail_reg flags")
> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> index 86539c1686fa..e77a5bf2d940 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> @@ -10656,6 +10656,8 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_create(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  	int r;
>  
>  	vcpu->arch.last_vmentry_cpu = -1;
> +	vcpu->arch.regs_avail = ~0;
> +	vcpu->arch.regs_dirty = ~0;
>  
>  	if (!irqchip_in_kernel(vcpu->kvm) || kvm_vcpu_is_reset_bsp(vcpu))
>  		vcpu->arch.mp_state = KVM_MP_STATE_RUNNABLE;

Reviewed-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>

-- 
Vitaly


  reply	other threads:[~2021-09-21 13:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-09-21  0:02 [PATCH v2 00/10] KVM: x86: Clean up RESET "emulation" Sean Christopherson
2021-09-21  0:02 ` [PATCH v2 01/10] KVM: x86: Mark all registers as avail/dirty at vCPU creation Sean Christopherson
2021-09-21 13:40   ` Vitaly Kuznetsov [this message]
2021-09-21  0:02 ` [PATCH v2 02/10] KVM: x86: Clear KVM's cached guest CR3 at RESET/INIT Sean Christopherson
2021-09-21 13:52   ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2021-09-21 13:55     ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2021-09-21 17:35   ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-09-21  0:02 ` [PATCH v2 03/10] KVM: x86: Do not mark all registers as avail/dirty during RESET/INIT Sean Christopherson
2021-09-21  0:02 ` [PATCH v2 04/10] KVM: x86: Remove defunct setting of CR0.ET for guests during vCPU create Sean Christopherson
2021-09-21 14:23   ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2021-09-21  0:02 ` [PATCH v2 05/10] KVM: x86: Remove defunct setting of XCR0 for guest " Sean Christopherson
2021-09-21 14:37   ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2021-09-21  0:02 ` [PATCH v2 06/10] KVM: x86: Fold fx_init() into kvm_arch_vcpu_create() Sean Christopherson
2021-09-21 14:52   ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2021-10-06 23:04     ` Sean Christopherson
2021-09-21  0:03 ` [PATCH v2 07/10] KVM: VMX: Drop explicit zeroing of MSR guest values at vCPU creation Sean Christopherson
2021-09-21 15:02   ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2021-09-21  0:03 ` [PATCH v2 08/10] KVM: VMX: Move RESET emulation to vmx_vcpu_reset() Sean Christopherson
2021-09-21  0:03 ` [PATCH v2 09/10] KVM: SVM: Move RESET emulation to svm_vcpu_reset() Sean Christopherson
2021-09-21  0:03 ` [PATCH v2 10/10] KVM: x86: WARN on non-zero CRs at RESET to detect improper initalization Sean Christopherson
2021-09-21 13:59   ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2021-09-23 16:23 ` [PATCH v2 00/10] KVM: x86: Clean up RESET "emulation" Paolo Bonzini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87bl4m9hd1.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com \
    --to=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    --cc=jmattson@google.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=reijiw@google.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.