From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>, Chris Down <chris@chrisdown.name>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the wireless-drivers-next tree with the printk tree
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2021 20:01:16 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87bl5wf1k3.fsf@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210809131813.3989f9e8@canb.auug.org.au> (Stephen Rothwell's message of "Mon, 9 Aug 2021 13:18:13 +1000")
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> writes:
> Today's linux-next merge of the wireless-drivers-next tree got a
> conflict in:
>
> MAINTAINERS
>
> between commit:
>
> 337015573718 ("printk: Userspace format indexing support")
>
> from the printk tree and commit:
>
> d249ff28b1d8 ("intersil: remove obsolete prism54 wireless driver")
>
> from the wireless-drivers-next tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
Thanks, the conflict is trivial enough so Linus should handle it without
problems.
--
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-17 17:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-09 3:18 linux-next: manual merge of the wireless-drivers-next tree with the printk tree Stephen Rothwell
2021-08-17 17:01 ` Kalle Valo [this message]
2021-08-24 2:07 ` Stephen Rothwell
2021-08-24 2:09 ` Stephen Rothwell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87bl5wf1k3.fsf@codeaurora.org \
--to=kvalo@codeaurora.org \
--cc=chris@chrisdown.name \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com \
--cc=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.