From: John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>
To: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] printk: fix buffer overflow potential for print_text()
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2021 12:50:47 +0106 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87bldl5exc.fsf@jogness.linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YAa0j9CG/6yrGcs+@jagdpanzerIV.localdomain>
On 2021-01-19, Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> John, how did you spot these problems?
>>
>> I am preparing my series to remove the logbuf_lock, which also
>> refactors and consolidates code from syslog_print_all() and
>> kmsg_dump_get_buffer(). While testing/verifying my series, I noticed
>> the these oddities in the semantics and decided I should research
>> where they came from and if they were actually necessary.
>
> Any chance you can put those tests somewhere public so that we can
> run them regularly?
I have a collection of hacked-together tools that I use to test most of
the various interfaces of printk. I would need to clean them up if they
should be used for any kind of automated regression testing.
And where should I make such things available? I could put them in a
repo in the Linutronix github account (like I did for the ringbuffer
stress testing tool). (??)
John
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-19 11:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-14 17:04 [PATCH] printk: fix buffer overflow potential for print_text() John Ogness
2021-01-15 12:04 ` Petr Mladek
2021-01-15 12:07 ` Petr Mladek
2021-01-19 0:44 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2021-01-19 8:54 ` John Ogness
2021-01-19 10:29 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2021-01-19 11:44 ` John Ogness [this message]
2021-01-19 12:22 ` Petr Mladek
2021-01-19 11:20 ` Petr Mladek
2021-01-15 14:16 ` John Ogness
2021-01-15 16:04 ` Petr Mladek
2021-01-22 21:21 ` Sven Schnelle
2021-01-22 23:42 ` John Ogness
2021-01-23 21:18 ` Sven Schnelle
2021-01-23 21:41 ` Sven Schnelle
2021-01-24 8:13 ` John Ogness
2021-01-24 8:59 ` Sven Schnelle
2021-02-26 17:19 ` Alexander Gordeev
2021-02-26 17:39 ` John Ogness
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87bldl5exc.fsf@jogness.linutronix.de \
--to=john.ogness@linutronix.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com \
--cc=sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.