Re: [RFC 08/10] autonuma, memory tiering: Select hotter pages to promote to fast memory node

["Huang\, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>]

Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> writes:

> On Mon, Nov 04, 2019 at 10:41:10AM +0800, Huang, Ying wrote:
>
>> >> +#define NUMA_SCAN_NR_HIST	16
>> >> +		int numa_scan_idx;
>> >> +		unsigned long numa_scan_jiffies[NUMA_SCAN_NR_HIST];
>> >> +		unsigned long numa_scan_starts[NUMA_SCAN_NR_HIST];
>> >
>> > Why 16? This is 4 cachelines.
>> 
>> We want to keep the NUMA scanning history reasonably long.  From
>> task_scan_min(), the minimal interval between task_numa_work() running
>> is about 100 ms by default.  So we can keep 1600 ms history by default
>> if NUMA_SCAN_NR_HIST is 16.  If user choose to use smaller
>> sysctl_numa_balancing_scan_size, then we can only keep shorter history.
>> In general, we want to keep no less than 1000 ms history.  So 16 appears
>> like a reasonable choice for us.  Any other suggestion?
>
> This is very good information for Changelogs and comments :-)

Thanks!  Will do this in the next version.

Best Regards,
Huang, Ying