From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: NeilBrown Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2018 10:36:12 +1000 Subject: [lustre-devel] [PATCH 01/18] lustre: grant: add support for OBD_CONNECT_GRANT_PARAM In-Reply-To: References: <1530573875-20465-1-git-send-email-jsimmons@infradead.org> <1530573875-20465-2-git-send-email-jsimmons@infradead.org> <0F41C25D-E055-489A-82B6-CF4728AFF905@cray.com> Message-ID: <87bmayrdoj.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org On Fri, Jul 06 2018, James Simmons wrote: >> ?On 7/2/18, 6:25 PM, "lustre-devel on behalf of James Simmons" wrote: >> >> From: Johann Lombardi >> Signed-off-by: Johann Lombardi >> Signed-off-by: Jinshan Xiong >> WC-bug-id: https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/2049 >> Reviewed-on: http://review.whamcloud.com/7793 >> Reviewed-by: Andreas Dilger >> Reviewed-by: Nathaniel Clark >> >> James, can you fix this up? I'm not sure how historical patches should be attributed, but Johann's address seems >> wrong. >> >> From should be attributed to Johann Lombardi . Also, the Bug URL should be >> https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-2049 . > > This is tricky one. The reason I updated the email address to avoid > bouncing emails. I would recommend never trying to update email addresses. The kernel history is full of addresses that are no longer valid. Discussion of patches should happen on lists, and interested parties should subscribe to the lists. If someone wants to particularly see emails sent to some old address of their's it should be easy enough to add some filtering. If you particularly want to contact the author of some old patch, it is unlikely to take to much searching to find a valid address (just ask on the email list - someone is bound to know). Bounces are a little bit annoying, but so is spam - we just learn ways to deal with it. For this particular patch I've restored the addresses from the original patch, even though I know some of them are no longer valid. They were valid when the review was done, and the effectively give credit to the company which paid for the review. I won't bother the rest though. Thanks, NeilBrown > Also this allows the original author the chance to > still reply. Does that seem reasonable? It is still in the air for > some people what their email address is to me. Ah you are right I > dropped the s. Its should be https://jira.whamcloud.com/.... -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 832 bytes Desc: not available URL: