From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39700) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a4VqA-0006sY-DL for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 03 Dec 2015 10:30:42 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a4Vq6-0002SI-Cc for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 03 Dec 2015 10:30:38 -0500 From: Markus Armbruster Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2015 16:30:31 +0100 Message-ID: <87bna7v9bc.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Subject: [Qemu-devel] Posible regressions around spapr-dr-connector property drc-connector[] List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, agraf@suse.de, david@gibson.dropbear.id.au 1. Before commit 94649d4 "spapr: Don't use QOM [*] syntax for DR connectors", the indexes were small integers: (qemu) info qom-tree /machine (pseries-2.4-machine) /unattached (container) [...] /device[5] (spapr-pci-host-bridge) /pci@800000020000000.mmio[0] (qemu:memory-region) /pci@800000020000000.mmio-alias[0] (qemu:memory-region) /pci@800000020000000.io[0] (qemu:memory-region) /pci@800000020000000.io-alias[0] (qemu:memory-region) /pci.0 (PCI) /pci@800000020000000.iommu-root[0] (qemu:memory-region) /dr-connector[0] (spapr-dr-connector) /dr-connector[1] (spapr-dr-connector) /dr-connector[2] (spapr-dr-connector) [...] Since then, they're big ones: /dr-connector[1073741824] (spapr-dr-connector) /dr-connector[1073741825] (spapr-dr-connector) /dr-connector[1073741826] (spapr-dr-connector) The commit message doesn't quite spell out this change, and I'm therefore double-checkint it's intentional. Is it? 2. Before commit 6c2f9a1 "qapi: Make output visitor return qnull() instead of NULL", qom-get returned {}: Since then, it returns null: QMP> { "execute": "qom-get", "arguments": { "path": "/machine/unattached/device[5]/dr-connector[1073741950]", "property": "fdt" } } {"return": null} Does anyone care?