From: Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org>
To: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] pipe: fix race with fcntl
Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2015 20:52:44 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87bnitz11v.fsf@openvz.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150412173458.GO889@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1584 bytes --]
Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> writes:
> On Sun, Apr 12, 2015 at 09:08:21PM +0400, Dmitry Monakhov wrote:
>> Fix other long standing issues caused by fcntl(,F_SETFL,):
>> - User can disable O_DIRECT for pipe[1] (paketized IO), but can not enable it again.
>> - Currently we do not set O_APPEND on pipe[1] (IMHO it is wrong, but let it be)
>> so it is reasonable to completely prohibit change O_APPEND flag on both
>> end's of pipe. Add ->check_flags method in order to diallow O_APPEND toggling.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org>
>> ---
>
> TBH, all those ->direct_IO != NULL checks seem to be a wrong approach.
> If nothing else, it forces several filesystem into inventing a fake
> ->direct_IO just to fool those tests. How about we
> * introduce FMODE_MAY_DIRECT and allow ->open() explicitly set it
> * make open_check_o_direct() and fcntl.c check that instead of poking
> in ->f_mapping->a_ops, etc.
> * provide a variant of generic_file_open() that would set that
> bit and use it on the filesystems that handle dio
100% agree. FMODE is perfect place for that.
BTW: I always wondering: why we do not mark pipe[1]->f_flags with O_APPEND?
Probably the answer is that nobody care about ->f_flags since no_llseek
returns -ESPIPE, but f_flags are visiable via fcntl so IMHO it is
reasonable to fix that too.
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 472 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-12 17:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-12 17:08 [PATCH 0/2] fs: make pipe/splice fcntl safe Dmitry Monakhov
2015-04-12 17:08 ` [PATCH 1/2] pipe: fix race with fcntl Dmitry Monakhov
2015-04-12 17:34 ` Al Viro
2015-04-12 17:52 ` Dmitry Monakhov [this message]
2015-04-12 17:08 ` [PATCH 2/2] splice: fix race beween splice_write vs fcntl Dmitry Monakhov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87bnitz11v.fsf@openvz.org \
--to=dmonakhov@openvz.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.