From: ebiederm-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Linux Containers
<containers-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Andrew Lutomirski <andy-RHosVwM/Cj8@public.gmane.org>,
security-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org,
Serge Hallyn
<serge.hallyn-GeWIH/nMZzLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
Al Viro <viro-RmSDqhL/yNMiFSDQTTA3OLVCufUGDwFn@public.gmane.org>,
Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
Subject: [REVIEW][PATCH 2/5] mnt: Move the test for MNT_LOCK_READONLY from change_mount_flags into do_remount
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2014 20:53:10 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87bns7jye1.fsf_-_@x220.int.ebiederm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87ppgnjyx4.fsf_-_-JOvCrm2gF+uungPnsOpG7nhyD016LWXt@public.gmane.org> (Eric W. Biederman's message of "Tue, 29 Jul 2014 20:41:43 -0700")
There are no races as locked mount flags are guaranteed to never change.
Moving the test into do_remount makes it more visible, and ensures all
filesystem remounts pass the MNT_LOCK_READONLY permission check. This
second case is not an issue today as filesystem remounts are guarded
by capable(CAP_DAC_ADMIN) and thus will always fail in less privileged
mount namespaces, but it could become an issue in the future.
Cc: stable-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
---
fs/namespace.c | 13 ++++++++++---
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/namespace.c b/fs/namespace.c
index cb40449ea0df..1105a577a14f 100644
--- a/fs/namespace.c
+++ b/fs/namespace.c
@@ -1896,9 +1896,6 @@ static int change_mount_flags(struct vfsmount *mnt, int ms_flags)
if (readonly_request == __mnt_is_readonly(mnt))
return 0;
- if (mnt->mnt_flags & MNT_LOCK_READONLY)
- return -EPERM;
-
if (readonly_request)
error = mnt_make_readonly(real_mount(mnt));
else
@@ -1924,6 +1921,16 @@ static int do_remount(struct path *path, int flags, int mnt_flags,
if (path->dentry != path->mnt->mnt_root)
return -EINVAL;
+ /* Don't allow changing of locked mnt flags.
+ *
+ * No locks need to be held here while testing the various
+ * MNT_LOCK flags because those flags can never be cleared
+ * once they are set.
+ */
+ if ((mnt->mnt.mnt_flags & MNT_LOCK_READONLY) &&
+ !(mnt_flags & MNT_READONLY)) {
+ return -EPERM;
+ }
err = security_sb_remount(sb, data);
if (err)
return err;
--
1.9.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-30 3:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <87fvih4a99.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org>
[not found] ` <CAObL_7FfacSTdO=JEfYyqQrp8qOSob6qoWrGN=rSM5t9ckkTWg@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <8761injfj9.fsf_-_@x220.int.ebiederm.org>
[not found] ` <CAObL_7GhpuO4m6HunKvNMSpiEYBuaJnvjfVDiyG88GZ8HOa-vg@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <CAOP=4wgKGxJmLwSHYRKXCTva_Fyzn+D1vaWhtT-mo_t9Uu68zA@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <87lhrihaan.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org>
[not found] ` <CAObL_7HSNkM=Kr9Jwc9JB7Zt7ZdR+skzmPrxYcFSkCutFDA5KA@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <20140724194920.GU26600@ubuntumail>
[not found] ` <CAOP=4wh-AXf7qPy0rPaQ6RFbbJGRWKo0h1Rn=9vLUeJ6b6Q7YA@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <8738dqh2j1.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org>
[not found] ` <20140725060810.GC31313@1wt.eu>
[not found] ` <877g2xou2u.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org>
[not found] ` <87r415nf3k.fsf_-_@x220.int.ebiederm.org>
[not found] ` <874my1neyr.fsf_-_@x220.int.ebiederm.org>
[not found] ` <CAOP=4wj7m+w4aDJCuQaf3r9aFraPN1SvPgFSz=_UNkyC8gEHyQ@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <CAOP=4wj7m+w4aDJCuQaf3r9aFraPN1SvPgFSz=_UNkyC8gEHyQ-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2014-07-30 3:38 ` [REVIEW][0/5] Fixing unprivileged mount -o remount,ro Eric W. Biederman
2014-07-30 3:41 ` Eric W. Biederman
[not found] ` <87ppgnjyx4.fsf_-_-JOvCrm2gF+uungPnsOpG7nhyD016LWXt@public.gmane.org>
2014-07-30 3:52 ` [REVIEW][PATCH 1/5] mnt: Only change user settable mount flags in remount Eric W. Biederman
[not found] ` <87ha1zjyf0.fsf_-_-JOvCrm2gF+uungPnsOpG7nhyD016LWXt@public.gmane.org>
2014-07-31 23:13 ` Serge Hallyn
2014-08-01 0:10 ` Eric W. Biederman
2014-07-30 3:53 ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
[not found] ` <87bns7jye1.fsf_-_-JOvCrm2gF+uungPnsOpG7nhyD016LWXt@public.gmane.org>
2014-07-31 23:11 ` [REVIEW][PATCH 2/5] mnt: Move the test for MNT_LOCK_READONLY from change_mount_flags into do_remount Serge Hallyn
2014-07-30 3:53 ` [REVIEW][PATCH 3/5] mnt: Correct permission checks in do_remount Eric W. Biederman
[not found] ` <877g2vjyd7.fsf_-_-JOvCrm2gF+uungPnsOpG7nhyD016LWXt@public.gmane.org>
2014-07-31 23:06 ` Serge Hallyn
2014-07-30 3:54 ` [REVIEW][PATCH 4/5] mnt: Change the default remount atime from relatime to the existing value Eric W. Biederman
[not found] ` <871tt3jycd.fsf_-_-JOvCrm2gF+uungPnsOpG7nhyD016LWXt@public.gmane.org>
2014-07-31 22:59 ` Serge Hallyn
2014-07-30 3:55 ` [REVIEW][PATCH 5/5] mnt: Add tests for unprivileged remount cases that have found to be faulty Eric W. Biederman
[not found] ` <87vbqfijq0.fsf_-_-JOvCrm2gF+uungPnsOpG7nhyD016LWXt@public.gmane.org>
2014-07-31 22:48 ` Serge Hallyn
2014-07-31 22:52 ` Eric W. Biederman
[not found] ` <87fvhhdtua.fsf-JOvCrm2gF+uungPnsOpG7nhyD016LWXt@public.gmane.org>
2014-07-31 23:15 ` Serge Hallyn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87bns7jye1.fsf_-_@x220.int.ebiederm.org \
--to=ebiederm-as9lmozglivwk0htik3j/w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=andy-RHosVwM/Cj8@public.gmane.org \
--cc=containers-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=security-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=serge.hallyn-GeWIH/nMZzLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=viro-RmSDqhL/yNMiFSDQTTA3OLVCufUGDwFn@public.gmane.org \
--cc=w@1wt.eu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.