From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46486) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W5DRj-00071o-SQ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 06:55:21 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W5DRd-0004xR-SF for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 06:55:15 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:60670) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W5DRd-0004xG-Ka for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 06:55:09 -0500 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s0KBt80Z006400 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 06:55:08 -0500 From: Markus Armbruster References: <1390214659-12296-1-git-send-email-alevy@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 12:55:05 +0100 In-Reply-To: <1390214659-12296-1-git-send-email-alevy@redhat.com> (Alon Levy's message of "Mon, 20 Jan 2014 12:44:18 +0200") Message-ID: <87bnz627hi.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] hw/display/qxl: improve framebuffer error message List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Alon Levy Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kraxel@redhat.com Alon Levy writes: > Signed-off-by: Alon Levy > --- > hw/display/qxl.c | 3 ++- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/hw/display/qxl.c b/hw/display/qxl.c > index e4f172e..f6af470 100644 > --- a/hw/display/qxl.c > +++ b/hw/display/qxl.c > @@ -1367,7 +1367,8 @@ static void qxl_create_guest_primary(PCIQXLDevice *qxl, int loadvm, > size = abs(requested_stride) * requested_height; > if (size > qxl->vgamem_size) { > qxl_set_guest_bug(qxl, "%s: requested primary larger then framebuffer" > - " size", __func__); > + " size %d > %d", __func__, size, > + qxl->vgamem_size); > return; > } Shouldn't you use %u or %PRIu32 to print uint32_t qxl->vgamem_size? Hmm, we're comparing int size to uint32_t vgamem_size, not nice. Should size be unsigned? Since you touch the message anyway, you could fix "larger then" to "larger than".