From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rusty Russell Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 1/3] virtio: add notify() callback to virtio_driver Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 12:00:55 +1030 Message-ID: <87bo1ebkxc.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> References: <1384960923-31463-1-git-send-email-graalfs@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1384960923-31463-2-git-send-email-graalfs@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1384960923-31463-2-git-send-email-graalfs@linux.vnet.ibm.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: Heinz Graalfs , virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org Cc: borntraeger@de.ibm.com, Jens Axboe , mst@redhat.com List-Id: virtualization@lists.linuxfoundation.org Heinz Graalfs writes: > Add an optional notify() callback to virtio_driver. A backend > driver can provide this callback to perform actions for a lost > device. > > notify() event values are inherited from virtio_ccw's notify() > callback. We might want to support even more of them lateron. > > notify() return values are defined in include/linux/notifier.h. > > Signed-off-by: Heinz Graalfs These patches seem sensible. I've applied them in my pending queue, but it'd be nice to have some feedback on the virtio_blk.c patch. Cheers, Rusty.