From: arnaud.patard@rtp-net.org (Arnaud Patard (Rtp))
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: makefile: work around toolchain bug in recent versions of binutils
Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2012 21:09:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87boit2js4.fsf@lebrac.rtp-net.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120802185033.GA2725@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com> (Will Deacon's message of "Thu, 2 Aug 2012 19:50:33 +0100")
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> writes:
> On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 07:18:10PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 04:51:41PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
>> > On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 04:30:30PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>> > > It might just be easier to specify something like -march=armv4 or
>> > > something like that, and then use .arch armv6 where required.
>> >
>> > We could do that, but I worry that it will become very messy if/when people
>> > start adding things like virtualisation instructions (hvc and co) to the
>> > entry code. Using the same march flag for kernel and decompressor also keeps
>> > everything consistent.
>>
>> But you're missing a fundamental point: the decompressor is not designed
>> to be built like that, it is designed to be built in such a way that it
>> works unmodified on any CPU type we have to date, whether you're building
>> a kernel for ARMv4 or ARMv7.
>>
>> So, the code sequences which are architecture specific are only executed
>> after we've checked the ID registers to determine what we should be doing
>> for a particular CPU.
>
> That's fine, *if* we can persuade the tools to build the thing for us. With
> march=all, we got what we wanted but now that doesn't seem to work anymore.
>
and we already had to fix -march=all in the past :
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12698
So maybe would be easier to try to fix it instead of trying to
workaround it ?
Arnaud
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-02 19:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-02 12:23 [PATCH] ARM: makefile: work around toolchain bug in recent versions of binutils Will Deacon
2012-08-02 13:04 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-08-02 15:01 ` Will Deacon
2012-08-02 15:30 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-08-02 15:51 ` Will Deacon
2012-08-02 18:18 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-08-02 18:50 ` Will Deacon
2012-08-02 19:09 ` Arnaud Patard (Rtp) [this message]
2012-08-02 19:44 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87boit2js4.fsf@lebrac.rtp-net.org \
--to=arnaud.patard@rtp-net.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.