From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
To: Vincent Guittot
<public-vincent.guittot-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@plane.gmane.org>
Cc: public-linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@plane.gmane.org,
public-linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@plane.gmane.org,
public-linaro-dev-cunTk1MwBs8s++Sfvej+rw@plane.gmane.org,
public-devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@plane.gmane.org,
public-a.p.zijlstra-/NLkJaSkS4VmR6Xm/wNWPw@plane.gmane.org,
public-rob.herring-bsGFqQB8/DxBDgjK7y7TUQ@plane.gmane.org,
public-linux-lFZ/pmaqli7XmaaqVzeoHQ@plane.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] ARM: topology: factorize the update of sibling masks
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 09:54:31 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87bokehkfs.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1340094536-20873-3-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.org> (Vincent Guittot's message of "Tue, 19 Jun 2012 10:28:53 +0200")
On Tue, 19 Jun 2012 10:28:53 +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> This factorization has also been proposed in another patchset that has not been
> merged yet:
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2012-January/080873.html
> So, this patch could be dropped depending of the state of the other one.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
> Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
> ---
> arch/arm/kernel/topology.c | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
> 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/topology.c b/arch/arm/kernel/topology.c
> index 37e2e57..92c2fb3 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/topology.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/topology.c
> @@ -82,6 +82,31 @@ const struct cpumask *cpu_coregroup_mask(int cpu)
> return &cpu_topology[cpu].core_sibling;
> }
>
> +void update_siblings_masks(unsigned int cpuid)
> +{
> + struct cputopo_arm *cpu_topo, *cpuid_topo = &cpu_topology[cpuid];
> + int cpu;
> + /* update core and thread sibling masks */
> + for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> + cpu_topo = &cpu_topology[cpu];
> +
> + if (cpuid_topo->socket_id == cpu_topo->socket_id) {
I think this will make the code a little bit cleaner:
if (cpuid_topo->socket_id != cpu_topo->socket_id)
continue;
Thanks,
Namhyung
> + cpumask_set_cpu(cpuid, &cpu_topo->core_sibling);
> + if (cpu != cpuid)
> + cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &cpuid_topo->core_sibling);
> +
> + if (cpuid_topo->core_id == cpu_topo->core_id) {
> + cpumask_set_cpu(cpuid,
> + &cpu_topo->thread_sibling);
> + if (cpu != cpuid)
> + cpumask_set_cpu(cpu,
> + &cpuid_topo->thread_sibling);
> + }
> + }
> + }
> + smp_wmb();
> +}
> +
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-20 5:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-19 8:28 [PATCH v2 0/5] ARM: topology: set the capacity of each cores for big.LITTLE Vincent Guittot
2012-06-19 8:28 ` Vincent Guittot
2012-06-19 8:28 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] ARM: topology: Add arch_scale_freq_power function Vincent Guittot
2012-06-19 8:28 ` Vincent Guittot
2012-06-19 8:28 ` Vincent Guittot
[not found] ` <87fw9qhkl9.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com>
2012-06-20 9:04 ` Vincent Guittot
2012-06-20 9:04 ` Vincent Guittot
2012-06-19 8:28 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] ARM: topology: factorize the update of sibling masks Vincent Guittot
2012-06-19 8:28 ` Vincent Guittot
2012-06-19 8:28 ` Vincent Guittot
2012-06-20 0:54 ` Namhyung Kim [this message]
2012-06-19 8:28 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] ARM: topology: Update cpu_power according to DT information Vincent Guittot
2012-06-19 8:28 ` Vincent Guittot
2012-06-19 8:28 ` Vincent Guittot
[not found] ` <877gv2hjhb.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com>
2012-06-20 8:43 ` Vincent Guittot
2012-06-20 8:43 ` Vincent Guittot
2012-06-19 8:28 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] sched, x86: Remove broken power estimation Vincent Guittot
2012-06-19 8:28 ` Vincent Guittot
2012-06-19 8:28 ` Vincent Guittot
2012-06-19 8:28 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] sched: cpu_power: enable ARCH_POWER Vincent Guittot
2012-06-19 8:28 ` Vincent Guittot
2012-06-19 8:28 ` Vincent Guittot
2012-06-19 9:01 ` Yong Zhang
2012-06-19 9:01 ` Yong Zhang
2012-06-20 9:11 ` Vincent Guittot
2012-06-20 9:11 ` Vincent Guittot
2012-06-20 9:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-20 9:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-20 9:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87bokehkfs.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com \
--to=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=public-a.p.zijlstra-/NLkJaSkS4VmR6Xm/wNWPw@plane.gmane.org \
--cc=public-devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@plane.gmane.org \
--cc=public-linaro-dev-cunTk1MwBs8s++Sfvej+rw@plane.gmane.org \
--cc=public-linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@plane.gmane.org \
--cc=public-linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@plane.gmane.org \
--cc=public-linux-lFZ/pmaqli7XmaaqVzeoHQ@plane.gmane.org \
--cc=public-rob.herring-bsGFqQB8/DxBDgjK7y7TUQ@plane.gmane.org \
--cc=public-vincent.guittot-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@plane.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.