From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
To: Kalle Jokiniemi <kalle.jokiniemi@nokia.com>
Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, tony@atomide.com,
ilkka.koskinen@nokia.com, wim@iguana.be
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] omap_wdt: fix interface clock handling
Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2011 09:08:11 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87bp1lv8uc.fsf@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1299589583-22632-1-git-send-email-kalle.jokiniemi@nokia.com> (Kalle Jokiniemi's message of "Tue, 8 Mar 2011 15:06:21 +0200")
Kalle Jokiniemi <kalle.jokiniemi@nokia.com> writes:
> The runtime PM does not offer enough granularity to control
> individual clocks separately as needed. Current pm implementation
> of omap_wdt blocks the CORE power domain from idling in
> OMAP SoC, as it keeps the interface clock of the watchdog always
> on. This causes severe power leakage in devices where
> the omap watchdog is in active use.
The iclk remains active because it's in hardware-controlled
auto-idle mode.
I believe if you set the WDT hwmod to software-supported idle
(OCPIF_SWSUP_IDLE), the runtime PM idle (which calls omap_device idle,
then omap_hwmod_idle) should also gate the interface clock.
> This patch set reverts the omap_wdt move to runtime_pm and
> introduces a tight control of the interface clock in the driver
> to only enable it when registers are accessed. The patch is
> based on earlier patch by Atal Shargorodsky.
>
> If anyone has good suggestions how to fix this with runtime_pm,
> feel free to propose patches. Otherwise I suggest we revert
> back to something that works.
Can you try with software-supported idle and just making the runtime PM
calls more granular?
Kevin
> Tested with RX-51 S4.0 Macroboard, linux-omap-pm/pm branch and
> MeeGo armv7l release.
>
> Kalle Jokiniemi (2):
> Revert "OMAP: WDT: Use PM runtime APIs instead of clk FW APIs"
> Watchdog: omap_wdt: fix interface clock handling
>
> drivers/watchdog/omap_wdt.c | 64 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> 1 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-08 17:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-08 13:06 [PATCH 0/2] omap_wdt: fix interface clock handling Kalle Jokiniemi
2011-03-08 13:06 ` [PATCH 1/2] Revert "OMAP: WDT: Use PM runtime APIs instead of clk FW APIs" Kalle Jokiniemi
2011-03-08 13:06 ` [PATCH 2/2] Watchdog: omap_wdt: fix interface clock handling Kalle Jokiniemi
2011-03-08 23:04 ` Paul Walmsley
2011-03-08 17:08 ` Kevin Hilman [this message]
2011-03-08 23:01 ` [PATCH 0/2] " Paul Walmsley
2011-03-08 23:10 ` Paul Walmsley
2011-03-09 9:02 ` kalle.jokiniemi
2011-03-09 10:02 ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-03-09 10:40 ` kalle.jokiniemi
2011-03-09 11:33 ` kalle.jokiniemi
2011-03-09 14:06 ` kalle.jokiniemi
2011-03-10 8:20 ` kalle.jokiniemi
2011-03-09 6:35 ` kalle.jokiniemi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87bp1lv8uc.fsf@ti.com \
--to=khilman@ti.com \
--cc=ilkka.koskinen@nokia.com \
--cc=kalle.jokiniemi@nokia.com \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=wim@iguana.be \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.