From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kevin Hilman Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] da850/omap-l138: Add callback to control LCD panel power Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2009 14:45:28 -0800 Message-ID: <87bpi913w7.fsf@deeprootsystems.com> References: <1259304249-19439-1-git-send-email-chaithrika@ti.com> <871vj52vyt.fsf@deeprootsystems.com> <20091208122551.f632c665.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20091208122551.f632c665.akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org> (Andrew Morton's message of "Tue\, 8 Dec 2009 12\:25\:51 -0800") List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: davinci-linux-open-source-bounces-VycZQUHpC/PFrsHnngEfi1aTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org Errors-To: davinci-linux-open-source-bounces-VycZQUHpC/PFrsHnngEfi1aTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org To: Andrew Morton Cc: davinci-linux-open-source-VycZQUHpC/PFrsHnngEfi1aTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org, linux-fbdev-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org, krzysztof.h1-IjDXvh/HVVUAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org Andrew Morton writes: > On Tue, 08 Dec 2009 09:53:46 -0800 > Kevin Hilman wrote: > >> Chaithrika U S writes: >> >> > Add the platform specific callback to control LCD panel and >> > backlight power. >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Chaithrika U S >> > --- >> > This patch applies to DaVinci GIT tree at >> > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/khilman/linux-davinci.git;a=summary >> >> Andrew, >> >> I see you have pulled this series into -mm. Thanks. The >> drivers/video/* changes in patches 1,3 and 4 should go upstream >> through you, but I'd like to request that you drop this patch (PATCH >> 2/4) from your queue, and I will queue it in davinci-next. > > I autodrop patches when they turn up in linux-next. So if you want to > merge something then please just merge away, then I'll drop my copy. OK. > This way patches don't get lost, and I get to check whether the patch > which was in linux-next matches the version I had, and whether the patch > which was merged into linux-next is missing any followup patches which > I had accumulated against the original. Sounds good. Thanks for the explanation. Kevin