From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.43) id 1GCyhH-0000WS-BK for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Aug 2006 09:11:07 -0400 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GCyhF-0000WK-RM for grub-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Aug 2006 09:11:05 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GCyhB-0000Vw-Qx for grub-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Aug 2006 09:11:05 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GCyhB-0000Vt-Nj for grub-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Aug 2006 09:11:01 -0400 Received: from [195.54.107.70] (helo=mxfep01.bredband.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GCynE-0003vc-0R for grub-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Aug 2006 09:17:16 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain ([213.113.223.229] [213.113.223.229]) by mxfep01.bredband.com with ESMTP id <20060815131100.IVOF5813.mxfep01.bredband.com@localhost.localdomain> for ; Tue, 15 Aug 2006 15:11:00 +0200 From: Johan Rydberg To: The development of GRUB 2 References: <871wrjhrks.fsf@night.trouble.net> <200608151442.39891.okuji@enbug.org> Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 15:26:59 +0200 In-Reply-To: <200608151442.39891.okuji@enbug.org> (Yoshinori K. Okuji's message of "Tue, 15 Aug 2006 14:42:39 +0200") Message-ID: <87bqqmgme4.fsf@night.trouble.net> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Re: Let core developers "vote" to accept patches. X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GRUB 2 List-Id: The development of GRUB 2 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 13:11:06 -0000 "Yoshinori K. Okuji" writes: > Our rules are: > > - When you are a committer and a patch is trivial enough, you can > (and should) check in the patch by yourself. > > - If not, you should ask others in grub-devel. It was for these two scenarios I suggested we could vote on patches. But it might not be needed. I was after all just a suggestion. > - I retain final words as the designer of GRUB 2. For some certain > parts, I completely rely on other developers. For instance, Hollis > would even precede me in PowerPC-specific changes. Agreed. > - If a change is involved with political issues, official > maintainers must approve or disapprove. This is required for the GNU > Project. Of course. ~j