From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.43) id 1FWri0-0008Ds-9M for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Apr 2006 05:13:48 -0400 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FWrhy-0008Ac-Ml for grub-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Apr 2006 05:13:46 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FWrhx-000882-4l for grub-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Apr 2006 05:13:46 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FWrhw-00087f-TF for grub-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Apr 2006 05:13:44 -0400 Received: from [194.109.24.26] (helo=smtp-vbr6.xs4all.nl) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FWrjT-0007tf-7O for grub-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Apr 2006 05:15:19 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (249-174.surfsnel.dsl.internl.net [145.99.174.249]) by smtp-vbr6.xs4all.nl (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k3L9DeQe085233 for ; Fri, 21 Apr 2006 11:13:41 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from mgerards@xs4all.nl) Mail-Copies-To: mgerards@xs4all.nl To: The development of GRUB 2 References: From: Marco Gerards Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 11:15:09 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Hollis Blanchard's message of "Thu, 20 Apr 2006 22:23:29 -0500") Message-ID: <87bquvmgrm.fsf@xs4all.nl> User-Agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Subject: Re: [patch] rename "grubof" to "grub" X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GRUB 2 List-Id: The development of GRUB 2 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 09:13:46 -0000 Hollis Blanchard writes: > This patch renames "grubof", the executable name for PPC and Sparc, to > "grub". I'm still not sure what the naming convention should be for > the executable output by grub-mkimage; I'm thinking maybe > "grub.ppc". It isn't an image ("grub.img"); it's still an ELF file... Personally I would prefer something like `_grub' so people see there is something special about it and just don't use it like that. After that the output file can just be called grub if people want that. -- Marco