From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.33) id 1CaDqm-0003tv-VM for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Dec 2004 08:51:57 -0500 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CaDqk-0003tW-6j for grub-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Dec 2004 08:51:54 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CaDqi-0003t1-Tl for grub-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Dec 2004 08:51:53 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CaDqi-0003sD-MR for grub-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Dec 2004 08:51:52 -0500 Received: from [193.45.208.6] (helo=griffin.skarpodata.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 4.34) id 1CaDgC-0006ta-Ee for grub-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Dec 2004 08:41:01 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain (183.201.216.81.s-s.siw.siwnet.net [81.216.201.183]) by griffin.skarpodata.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id iB3F5bld002374; Fri, 3 Dec 2004 16:05:37 +0100 To: The development of GRUB 2 References: <200411231701.07309.T.E.Baldwin99@members.leeds.ac.uk> <200411260047.59184.T.E.Baldwin99@members.leeds.ac.uk> <87sm6wrk0a.fsf@marco.marco-g.com> <200411270136.33598.T.E.Baldwin99@members.leeds.ac.uk> <87is7jlf04.fsf@marco.marco-g.com> From: Johan Rydberg Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2004 14:51:40 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87is7jlf04.fsf@marco.marco-g.com> (Marco Gerards's message of "Fri, 03 Dec 2004 12:53:31 +0000") Message-ID: <87brdbtrpv.fsf@night.trouble.net> User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Subject: Re: RISC OS port X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GRUB 2 List-Id: The development of GRUB 2 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2004 13:51:54 -0000 Marco Gerards writes: > Timothy Baldwin writes: > >> Instead part of functionality of the stubs is included in >> kern/arm/RISC_OS/startup.S, as such we are free to choose which names we use >> for them. For clairity I suggest we use the standard names, as opposed to >> prefixing the names with grub_RISC_OS_ or simular. > > Better use a prefix, right? I don't see how it will get clearer by > not using the prefix. And the coding style used in GRUB says to use > prefixes, so we can better do that unless it really is not possible. And please choose something else than grub_RISC_OS_ -- like grub_risc_os. Otherwise I will not be able to get a good nights sleep for years to come. ~j