From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264435AbTKNUPm (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Nov 2003 15:15:42 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264538AbTKNUPm (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Nov 2003 15:15:42 -0500 Received: from mail.parknet.co.jp ([210.171.160.6]:12038 "EHLO mail.parknet.co.jp") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264435AbTKNUPl (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Nov 2003 15:15:41 -0500 To: Andries Brouwer Cc: Patrick Beard , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.0-test9 VFAT problem References: <09A92EA4A9D2D51182170004AC96FE7A1216BB@mercury.scotcomms> <20031114190337.GA18107@win.tue.nl> From: OGAWA Hirofumi Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2003 05:15:26 +0900 In-Reply-To: <20031114190337.GA18107@win.tue.nl> Message-ID: <87brrer9k1.fsf@devron.myhome.or.jp> User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Andries Brouwer writes: > > Yes, with 2.4 I used sda1. When I first compiled 2.6 I used sda1 but I got > > the 'wrong fs..' error. This was a clean install of debian so I didn't have > > my original fstab. I checked the web and noticed people using sda. so I > > tried that - same error. In trying to get this to work I've used sda and > > sda1 at different times both gave the same errors. [...] > Only try sda1, and report whatever goes wrong in that case. Ah, I see. His error message are... -- OGAWA Hirofumi