From: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp>
To: Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl
Cc: torvalds@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.0-test9
Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2003 22:57:32 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87brs4drub.fsf@devron.myhome.or.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <UTC200310261108.h9QB88m25135.aeb@smtp.cwi.nl>
Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl writes:
> > Pls forward.
>
> The first FAT entry should have the media byte (0xf0,0xf8,...,0xff)
> extended with all 1 bits in the first FAT entry.
> Checking this is a good idea, it prevents us from mounting garbage
> as FAT - there is no good magic for FAT.
> Unfortunately, Windows does not enforce this, and 2.4 doesn't either.
> It turns out that there are filesystems around (two reports so far)
> that have a zero first FAT entry, and work under Windows and 2.4 but
> fail to mount under 2.6.
>
> So, the below weakens the test.
Looks good to me. I have no objection.
However, the following may be a bit useful info.
I tested on win2k and win95 installed at now.
win95's scandisk reported and fixed this problem.
win2k's chkdsk detect problem and fixed. But GUI tool doesn't detect,
and can't fixed.
--
OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-10-26 13:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-10-26 11:08 Linux 2.6.0-test9 Andries.Brouwer
2003-10-26 13:57 ` OGAWA Hirofumi [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-10-27 10:58 Andries.Brouwer
2003-10-27 9:47 Mikael Pettersson
2003-10-27 1:48 Andries.Brouwer
2003-10-27 2:10 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-10-27 9:40 ` David S. Miller
2003-10-26 19:40 Andries.Brouwer
2003-10-27 0:01 ` Andrew Morton
2003-10-27 0:21 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-10-27 0:28 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-10-27 6:43 ` David S. Miller
2003-10-27 19:54 ` kuznet
2003-10-27 19:36 ` kuznet
2003-10-28 0:42 ` Tommy Christensen
2003-10-28 18:25 ` kuznet
2003-10-26 18:51 P. Christeas
2003-10-27 3:16 ` Andrew Morton
2003-10-26 15:32 Shane Shrybman
2003-10-26 16:27 ` Marco Roeland
2003-10-26 10:59 Andries.Brouwer
2003-10-27 23:37 ` bill davidsen
2003-10-26 10:26 Andries.Brouwer
2003-10-26 1:16 Andries.Brouwer
2003-10-26 3:12 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2003-10-26 5:48 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-10-27 23:26 ` bill davidsen
2003-10-30 9:20 ` Russell King
2003-10-30 16:44 ` Bill Davidsen
2003-10-30 17:23 ` John Bradford
2003-10-25 19:09 Linus Torvalds
2003-10-25 19:52 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2003-10-25 20:14 ` viro
2003-10-25 22:35 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-10-25 23:45 ` Jose Luis Domingo Lopez
2003-10-26 12:05 ` Patrik Wallstrom
2003-10-27 18:21 ` Patrik Wallstrom
2003-10-27 22:51 ` bill davidsen
2003-10-28 2:12 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-10-28 4:52 ` Bill Davidsen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87brs4drub.fsf@devron.myhome.or.jp \
--to=hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp \
--cc=Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.