From: Philippe Gerum <rpm@xenomai.org>
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
Cc: Xenomai <xenomai@lists.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [libevl][PATCH] tests: sched-quota: Perform calibration without quota again
Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2026 11:22:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87cxutfk1f.fsf@xenomai.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b78962e2-2109-49c8-9c88-8acb4b282f67@siemens.com> (Jan Kiszka's message of "Mon, 31 Aug 2026 16:56:35 +0200")
Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com> writes:
> From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
>
> It defeats the purpose of the test when we calibrate under quota as we
> can no longer compare the actual cap against the configured value.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
> ---
> tests/sched-quota-accuracy.c | 14 ++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/sched-quota-accuracy.c b/tests/sched-quota-accuracy.c
> index 1bf5eb9..ac04449 100644
> --- a/tests/sched-quota-accuracy.c
> +++ b/tests/sched-quota-accuracy.c
> @@ -171,15 +171,15 @@ static void *quota_thread(void *arg)
> __Tcall_assert(t->efd, evl_attach_self("quota-runner:%d.%d",
> getpid(), serial));
>
> + wait_phase(calibration_phase);
> +
> + do_work(t, PERIOD_NS * NR_PERIODS);
> +
> attrs.sched_policy = SCHED_QUOTA;
> attrs.sched_priority = QUOTA_PRIO;
> attrs.sched_quota_group = tgid;
> __Tcall_assert(ret, evl_set_schedattr(t->efd, &attrs));
>
> - wait_phase(calibration_phase);
> -
> - do_work(t, PERIOD_NS * NR_PERIODS);
> -
> wait_phase(accuracy_measurement_phase);
>
> do_work(t, PERIOD_NS * NR_PERIODS);
> @@ -338,7 +338,8 @@ static struct accuracy_results run_quota(void)
> * expressed as a percentage. The closest to the QUOTA_PERCENT
> * target, the better.
> */
> - results.accuracy = ((double)loops_at_accuracy * 100.0) / (double)loops_at_calibration;
> + results.accuracy = 100.0 *
> + ((double)loops_at_accuracy * 100.0 / QUOTA_PERCENT) / (double)loops_at_calibration;
>
> /*
> * Level of noise observed for the disrupted run compared to
> @@ -346,7 +347,8 @@ static struct accuracy_results run_quota(void)
> * run was faster than the calibration one, which would still
> * be correct.
> */
> - results.noise = 100.0 - (((double)loops_with_disruption * 100.0) / (double)loops_at_calibration);
> + results.noise = 100.0 - (100.0 *
> + ((double)loops_with_disruption * 100.0 / QUOTA_PERCENT) / (double)loops_at_calibration);
>
> __Tcall_assert(ret, cleanup_group());
Merged, thanks.
--
Philippe.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-04 9:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-31 14:56 [libevl][PATCH] tests: sched-quota: Perform calibration without quota again Jan Kiszka
2026-09-04 9:22 ` Philippe Gerum [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87cxutfk1f.fsf@xenomai.org \
--to=rpm@xenomai.org \
--cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=xenomai@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.