From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [193.142.43.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E113437457 for ; Thu, 3 Sep 2026 08:24:38 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1788423880; cv=none; b=qGdDmxaWVG5a6e2W22mmAB5NOxu2axp6W2mAsFT5RDSt+my/ab02/BuJ0qO3QlpIfX4WoyTWFREpNAz5sh5YVpgTOFE3OwmzwwU+sKkfo3Ym584rfASdIMz3ZXOaWNxzZfZrQR/KA3lppZQPscoBAFlXLGwW/t0twAgLRmewnh8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1788423880; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Ls4xniOjZvy5k7qWaJ+bT9dRttTYo5UPShghXw3DL8g=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=nLczbmDgFdQHnqTZsdadZoRS7cpPOIkwZpohPsE9YHi55IoffZan1ZvSQzP2ctBpamZgZcYAqXhXgn18gfArQ9C+Z2brlxlTBVEmpeHp9gtqWRVpgLLCay2x9h4mpB6iQDBfPuaTVU6t8iMKhc0x1/x1Ky5Fd8nrUWZ03Td0oSg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=RVpZKePw; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=EuRwRA+n; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="RVpZKePw"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="EuRwRA+n" From: Nam Cao DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1788423877; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Ls4xniOjZvy5k7qWaJ+bT9dRttTYo5UPShghXw3DL8g=; b=RVpZKePwsgjPGHsweB7GsSuZAyk6Vl8bcGSJUN6FBtM9LdDAnHDTYpG6/2temWpyraRJTj +1bWgj1+i/XprSF2i6YQOUoR+Vsko6rVtZM1BokT2dHT2OEA23JAM0FRAfS6lphHjOegnh vgVH1XfCVMIIPGlyGGrbsi9W3Qtp5Q1qMuM7i+kiPFV7YOuAZypFfOEMnQysoVhQpRwWmH sX/XAuMKyvlGlF/h6w7AY6WdhaYlI+Vejb8NEpi4SRSQtqQNXYLVt/aTFvYXKBLA9RVx/h 65RCKpw9Jo2ouDGLcSUv3e4vZSaTa4K9QQUrFq0ytj3o52TtkPzLhckQFMRb0g== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1788423877; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Ls4xniOjZvy5k7qWaJ+bT9dRttTYo5UPShghXw3DL8g=; b=EuRwRA+nb7Nc94Y1bLLMKkBSwoTlXFOzsm6Vl3tC88wEcv4xGKBRogh0aJ7iEG+Sq1mt6V eezpmJsJxikFaDDg== To: Anshika Jain Cc: Andy Shevchenko , Greg Kroah-Hartman , sashiko-bot@kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-staging@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: fbtft: fix len<=0 buffer overflow in define_fbtft_write_reg() In-Reply-To: References: <20260902045026.7442-1-anshikajain196872@gmail.com> <87wlt3vnzp.fsf@yellow.woof> Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2026 10:24:36 +0200 Message-ID: <87cxuu68u3.fsf@yellow.woof> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-staging@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain No html email please, the mailing lists will not get them. Anshika Jain writes: > I'd like to keep this as a small safety check for the future, not as a fix > for a bug happening today. If you think that's not worth adding, I'm fine > dropping the patch. As mentioned, such bug would show up immediately in testing. So I vote dropping it. Nam