From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E05B126C02
	for <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>; Sun, 24 May 2026 15:48:32 +0000 (UTC)
Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18
ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116;
	t=1779637714; cv=none; b=PWcEqUTLOyfcUzSHmvGw0/Jdew2G3o8EZuGkqeS6C5kBrtGqGnVcfl429K5Utl72kRAK4W9mLX/stDchtqXLmK5BYQKLB5l+ZciYeJasgXbw1nD0c/zvUQGmuWA9cC4uPL4qkriSBfSalSPU8uRVGPz9alCzjE2Sh6TJjH+SqbA=
ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org;
	s=arc-20240116; t=1779637714; c=relaxed/simple;
	bh=VDZOsrVXkgMpqa/RCfmkWjf3O1hKLjQwcwAz6VU4ujk=;
	h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID:
	 MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=QD6Or+v7GBb5fZ8zb/SA9U0WwqGJVvM68wvnrqqOnguCFCDEnJ57OerZWX81yUEA0IU73yqOSCHbvgGDZ98qsoFmqQwBk1ndZ/pmqpwRH2qiiKls1Q4vB4Ft9GrSaevXEtF309xHYxGMFkRxLq324bzP0vp8Fud/3rnBPlGiKGE=
ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=ikmcVssz; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18
Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org;
	dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="ikmcVssz"
Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with UTF8SMTPSA id DFBE71F000E9;
	Sun, 24 May 2026 15:48:31 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org;
	s=k20260515; t=1779637712;
	bh=VDZOsrVXkgMpqa/RCfmkWjf3O1hKLjQwcwAz6VU4ujk=;
	h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date;
	b=ikmcVsszD7++TAH8tY16zzT26O+qe0RVryUALANZVkISJgaN4oLE9a+Dgmp5nza30
	 /IU6vdlS+HEna3NGOauf/VlH2oY/8dRNTyyI6ZbY51ksmHa7uSJdT5kaEbI9SSB4+i
	 7UwpOq4WBjlyxofZITUiDfFm6WOfXDhLLGKWbGfWSwqbWQ4DZUeDU89N1udj+vuRqB
	 aRaEYY12u9xX17UMtW20gb+HSI2RJIfvhzx29rE4uwoDPWoBNh6ZDbjt7ge70Rpxlu
	 R5R3KAyZDcUUK5tnNxqd5JAeMvHFwSseVpL9o5oulKuJklci+s5o3rpyPmlfQWRRAS
	 DSKLlT1dTFO1w==
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>, Miroslav Lichvar
 <mlichvar@redhat.com>
Cc: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>, Wen Gu
 <guwen@linux.alibaba.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>, "David S.
 Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>, Jakub
 Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, John Stultz
 <jstultz@google.com>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>, Anna-Maria Behnsen
 <anna-maria@linutronix.de>, Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
 Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
 Thomas =?utf-8?Q?Wei=C3=9Fschuh?= <thomas.weissschuh@linutronix.de>, Arnd
 Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Julien Ridoux <ridouxj@amazon.com>, Ryan Luu
 <rluu@amazon.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Marcelo Tosatti
 <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/8] timekeeping: Fix draft tracking precision
 and add feed-forward discipline via vmclock
In-Reply-To: <87h5nwu8d6.ffs@tglx>
References: <20260517220326.4625-1-dwmw2@infradead.org>
 <agximHA2EQLdYm9T@localhost>
 <0d32da75fa88c92ac0225ef23a9045afdf2ac9fe.camel@infradead.org>
 <ag2PdZvoP4w6Oplx@localhost>
 <dc4d0d491091fc4a00b79f7294a749f731f65f23.camel@infradead.org>
 <87o6i8vcni.ffs@tglx>
 <6c7137748ccea288fdf55e7c2e24817ccc1673ef.camel@infradead.org>
 <874ijzvpl8.ffs@tglx>
 <00609fa255442648e11e2b5596a3b80a29edcfc8.camel@infradead.org>
 <87v7cftqey.ffs@tglx>
 <0b1f41d3709b18c375e6f2743547016afe2ab32c.camel@infradead.org>
 <87jyssu9dw.ffs@tglx> <87h5nwu8d6.ffs@tglx>
Date: Sun, 24 May 2026 17:48:29 +0200
Message-ID: <87cxyku7ua.ffs@tglx>
Precedence: bulk
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:linux-kernel+subscribe@vger.kernel.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:linux-kernel+unsubscribe@vger.kernel.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain

On Sun, May 24 2026 at 17:37, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Sun, May 24 2026 at 17:15, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> And it's worse. We both are wrong :)
>
> There is an existing bug in that code for the retry case. Fix below.

I've updated the git branch accordingly.