From: Peter Korsgaard <peter@korsgaard.com>
To: "Guillaume Gonnet" <ggonnet.linux@gmail.com>
Cc: "Mikulas Patocka" <mpatocka@redhat.com>,
"Alasdair Kergon" <agk@redhat.com>,
"Mike Snitzer" <snitzer@kernel.org>,
"Benjamin Marzinski" <bmarzins@redhat.com>,
<dm-devel@schwermer.no>, <chanho.min@lge.com>,
<jaeyuel.im@lge.com>, <dm-devel@lists.linux.dev>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dm init: ensure device probing has finished in dm-mod.waitfor=
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2026 11:53:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87cy10dr9q.fsf@dell.be.48ers.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DH6MMYX3TX5Y.R3N3IX6370ED@gmail.com> (Guillaume Gonnet's message of "Thu, 19 Mar 2026 09:47:47 +0100")
>>>>> "Guillaume" == Guillaume Gonnet <ggonnet.linux@gmail.com> writes:
> Hello Peter,
> Here are my answers to your questions.
Thanks for the details.
>> This looks nontrivial, a comment would be helpful.
> I think the commit message contains enough information to understand why
> the second wait_for_device_probe() call is required, a comment would
> contain less information so I prefer letting the code like that.
OK. Ideally the above description would have made it into the commit
message, but fine.
--
Bye, Peter Korsgaard
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-19 10:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-17 21:32 [PATCH] dm init: ensure device probing has finished in dm-mod.waitfor= Guillaume Gonnet
2026-03-18 8:22 ` Peter Korsgaard
2026-03-18 9:25 ` Guillaume GONNET
2026-03-18 16:36 ` Mikulas Patocka
2026-03-18 17:57 ` Peter Korsgaard
2026-03-18 21:13 ` Mikulas Patocka
2026-03-19 8:47 ` Guillaume Gonnet
2026-03-19 10:53 ` Peter Korsgaard [this message]
2026-03-26 21:40 ` Francesco Valla
[not found] ` <abtakh4sU3HldDBB@BRUNHILD>
[not found] ` <DH6N0QM6764O.2CZNT5C8VH6Y1@gmail.com>
2026-03-27 4:33 ` Chanho Min
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87cy10dr9q.fsf@dell.be.48ers.dk \
--to=peter@korsgaard.com \
--cc=agk@redhat.com \
--cc=bmarzins@redhat.com \
--cc=chanho.min@lge.com \
--cc=dm-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=dm-devel@schwermer.no \
--cc=ggonnet.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=jaeyuel.im@lge.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mpatocka@redhat.com \
--cc=snitzer@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.