From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from list by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.90_1) id 1s2ppb-00070o-Ah for mharc-qemu-trivial@gnu.org; Fri, 03 May 2024 06:07:55 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1s2ppa-00070R-0u for qemu-trivial@nongnu.org; Fri, 03 May 2024 06:07:54 -0400 Received: from mail-lj1-x229.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::229]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1s2ppX-0003QN-U4 for qemu-trivial@nongnu.org; Fri, 03 May 2024 06:07:53 -0400 Received: by mail-lj1-x229.google.com with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-2db13ca0363so143282061fa.3 for ; Fri, 03 May 2024 03:07:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; t=1714730868; x=1715335668; darn=nongnu.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:references :in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=T3fOM+pl4bI+zQ6OHLH+FF4yznZmpCoizoYjHYd7lo4=; b=d/RQyxQ0PsVow2QKB7L3bzyPKf5sB23chXrkKKscwr7i62q7aPt6GLOOd0gI5iSboh 0hpevmwx+e+6kGDa1DciqEEDZFOMVkZ3db8Ig/FoZ6R4ZMf+EUksRYlxm43HnUJFzmTC Vwgms6RnpCKaar0rga7qEFFkmnh2Vg94IbV9E34iyPe6SmZW/o9KP1pq3ZcBd5NK3FrM G5F9ry2/DOG1cqvZdNIUX3gZYzyHKGl8ifq9XWilNkduhFxH0KSU2086Vy22EjeZ6ZUh c1ZXqls9Q8Gf/7lJSgy6mJQcMLjnQPIaZMDT1qobnAeEVrxccYzdag6/A6bwOJPNZdWf T3Yw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1714730868; x=1715335668; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:references :in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=T3fOM+pl4bI+zQ6OHLH+FF4yznZmpCoizoYjHYd7lo4=; b=YxhIfU1dRxQYJNFKiSa9fafgh8YiW9cHrsjybTpabV8VSZz0sWZWJltk1B7vCeNdpX d4B56hYKx5wAOOc+m/nldyFpXw1d5/fhWu70NM+/QyeK579XP5SfVvmhI774viE+4RFE 28iGaBd2fxiWlaL4KCSEPE+doGBSr2fl6ChJrzrlGXpHfEDNqhEA1ZftLLSBxd2OEITo 852hw7CaZBnhVWV1wLunONTYh9NCIPpGmYhTjlNQfUMuIRsWBUHc4p/uFDx7X0vyqHVz 5DdeNEqyjeOLqKmmmqFAF0MZIxJ1p5IX14GzowuZVG1qz0fFFiseGEPbjbKq8R3sd1R9 1AGg== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCUIolAuc2JjABH7ofVtXwwx2vXJk1sZMwvipONfPDUmAJhvgrxZ6jZE985Zpgq279yZO4ycAEWpVUxdi4hJ7LP7Dd9clNbp2Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Ywr/KkzqlnyS/kbosIwcP+dVfhCoKB3fER7XWMyD0lv9mySjvP6 fvD0iK/XvIX2ugQWw+Hv9vxX+aitC3qHLHh6zwru8Hs9HMWcJKz13iDUU/sC3lU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHCch3O4y7cQzgXCRgL1Ii9ClFPsyuI6yJrG76IFWX35JR7zctJZS82EzuulatRlkNpUdM4jQ== X-Received: by 2002:a2e:a23a:0:b0:2dc:fc58:9d74 with SMTP id i26-20020a2ea23a000000b002dcfc589d74mr1774282ljm.37.1714730868504; Fri, 03 May 2024 03:07:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from draig.lan ([85.9.250.243]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v17-20020a1709062f1100b00a55aee4bf74sm1533281eji.79.2024.05.03.03.07.48 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 03 May 2024 03:07:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from draig (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by draig.lan (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74FA65F753; Fri, 3 May 2024 11:07:47 +0100 (BST) From: =?utf-8?Q?Alex_Benn=C3=A9e?= To: Daniel P. =?utf-8?Q?Berrang=C3=A9?= Cc: Michael Tokarev , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-trivial@nongnu.org, Thomas Huth , Philippe =?utf-8?Q?Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9?= Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Re-enable riscv64-debian-cross-container (debian riscv64 is finally usable again!) In-Reply-To: ("Daniel P. =?utf-8?Q?Berrang?= =?utf-8?Q?=C3=A9=22's?= message of "Fri, 3 May 2024 09:07:34 +0100") References: <20240503071634.841103-1-mjt@tls.msk.ru> Date: Fri, 03 May 2024 11:07:47 +0100 Message-ID: <87cyq32op8.fsf@draig.linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::229; envelope-from=alex.bennee@linaro.org; helo=mail-lj1-x229.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-trivial@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 May 2024 10:07:54 -0000 Daniel P. Berrang=C3=A9 writes: > On Fri, May 03, 2024 at 10:16:34AM +0300, Michael Tokarev wrote: >> Revert "gitlab-ci: Disable the riscv64-debian-cross-container by default" >> This reverts commit f51f90c65ed7706c3c4f7a889ce3d6b7ab75ef6a. >>=20 >> riscv64 in debian has been non-functioning for almost a year, after the >> architecture has been promoted to release architecture is this for trixie or the next release? >> and all binary >> packages started to be re-built, making the port not multi-arch-co-insta= llable >> for a long time (in debian, multi-arch packages must be of the same vers= ion, >> but when a package is rebuilt on one architecture it gets a version bump= too). >> Later on, debiah had a long time64_t transition which made sid unusable = for >> quite some time too. Both such events happens in debian very rarely (li= ke, >> once in 10 years or so - for example, previous big transition like that = was >> libc5 =3D> libc6 transition). Now both of these are finished (where qem= u is >> concerned anyway). >>=20 >> Hopefully debian unstable wont be very unstable. At the very least it is >> better to have sporadic CI failures here than no riscv64 coverage at all. > > IME of running Debian sid in CI pipelines for libvirt, it is > way too unstable to be used as a gating job. There are periods > weeks-long when packages fail to install, even for relatively > mainstream arch targets like x86, let alone a new target like > riscv. I think testing can be more stable IME but I agree we still don't want it gating until we have a stable release. > > Running the job by default is sane, but it should not be made > gating until in a formal Debian release IMHO. > >>=20 >> Signed-off-by: Michael Tokarev >> --- >> v2: drop a TODO comment which turned out to be confused, replacing it >> with the description why debian riscv64 were unusable. >>=20 >> .gitlab-ci.d/container-cross.yml | 1 - >> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) >>=20 >> diff --git a/.gitlab-ci.d/container-cross.yml b/.gitlab-ci.d/container-c= ross.yml >> index e3103940a0..dbffed3f21 100644 >> --- a/.gitlab-ci.d/container-cross.yml >> +++ b/.gitlab-ci.d/container-cross.yml >> @@ -77,7 +77,6 @@ riscv64-debian-cross-container: >> allow_failure: true >> variables: >> NAME: debian-riscv64-cross >> - QEMU_JOB_OPTIONAL: 1 >>=20=20 >> s390x-debian-cross-container: >> extends: .container_job_template >> --=20 >> 2.39.2 >>=20 >>=20 > > With regards, > Daniel --=20 Alex Benn=C3=A9e Virtualisation Tech Lead @ Linaro