From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-lj1-f180.google.com (mail-lj1-f180.google.com [209.85.208.180]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6714A134B3 for ; Tue, 31 Oct 2023 12:57:01 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=xenomai.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=none Received: by mail-lj1-f180.google.com with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-2c509d5ab43so81004991fa.0 for ; Tue, 31 Oct 2023 05:57:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1698757019; x=1699361819; h=mime-version:message-id:in-reply-to:date:subject:cc:to:from :user-agent:references:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=Wy8TLNiLj52Mwwc3i9bXYhp4NzvQ/ItoaRbU5x2Vb2s=; b=nwOnVeZmvhICx7lEibKIEx2hFpB/w1C5abThuDFGKWHDdSSj28gWv2IUhz6IIjVSy2 iSXIX6E7BpSh1MRKEc/78/nEznBNhHhloOiI9Xb4ApdIiQoQWPmRxYy0alFdQzXRRc2Y c6ePNAp0zVHYaqHsAMacZUWAs7a/2NWZ7QRLdZFGIV9TQY5k2XZHwhOnrfco45L68U3B 5HSWFrE0T7YYcmilBUMhUuwMWGXSi6ZLsHEOqcjeEIdxgoTSrhqDFDf56TcJgTbGJJh8 J3KgmEEB3O8HGLokvftf3feGXcPHPb0M9tpG48xzYu/Z9JhIHrvcWoYypAl4bkh1Zmsd M8Tg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwxumHRXN97FBR0k3WGwSLUsqNgCDCvOIS3m/HDUCv+LETDXShp Pyn3IVYy/1nFz9bKpYYpZrTuTlsFSBax3Q== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IE8SbTMw4OmYlzgC6BlOzFqI9ofdRzBUur1tkOwfQYR/c3abbudDUIc0gTBk3OcmIsYmBVZtQ== X-Received: by 2002:a2e:9f06:0:b0:2bc:d634:2210 with SMTP id u6-20020a2e9f06000000b002bcd6342210mr9050707ljk.16.1698757019072; Tue, 31 Oct 2023 05:56:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pyro ([2a01:e0a:19b:3cd0:989a:5c4b:b7ff:baf]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z14-20020adff74e000000b003200c918c81sm1444545wrp.112.2023.10.31.05.56.57 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 31 Oct 2023 05:56:58 -0700 (PDT) References: <20231024093242.1077831-1-clara.kowalsky@siemens.com> <87lebjgi5x.fsf@xenomai.org> <87h6m7ghm1.fsf@xenomai.org> User-agent: mu4e 1.8.11; emacs 28.3 From: Philippe Gerum To: Florian Bezdeka Cc: Clara Kowalsky , xenomai@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [PATCH v3][Dovetail 6.6] arm64: dovetail: Fix undefinstr/break trap handling Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2023 13:55:07 +0100 In-reply-to: Message-ID: <87cywvgdba.fsf@xenomai.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: xenomai@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Florian Bezdeka writes: > On Tue, 2023-10-31 at 12:23 +0100, Philippe Gerum wrote: >> Florian Bezdeka writes: >> >> > On Tue, 2023-10-31 at 11:46 +0100, Philippe Gerum wrote: >> > > Ack. I initially thought we could postpone the in-band switch until >> > > after some of the emulation code paths have been considered (typically >> > > the MRS stuff), but that would involve convoluted logic for no obvious >> > > gain, so let's take the straightforward approach instead. The assumption >> > > here is that issuing an (emulated) MRS read request from a userland >> > > application should not happen from a time-critical context anyway, so >> > > doing this in-band should be acceptable. We'll see from complains if its >> > > not.. >> > > >> > > IOW, patch merged to v6.6, thanks. >> > >> > Nice! Thanks! >> > >> > > >> > > PS: There are three Dovetail branches to maintain concurrently ATM, >> > > twice that number when including the EVL trees. So please always mention >> > > the kernel release any patch sent my way applies to, this may help >> > > speeding up the process on my end (e.g. this patch conflicts, needs >> > > manual backport to v5.10, v6.1.y). >> > >> > We had [Dovetail 6.6] in the subject. I thought that should be >> > sufficient. Seems it's not. How should we make that clear? >> >> No, that's perfect. PEBKAC detected locally. > > Happens to the best ;-) > > Let us know if we can help backporting. Clara might have a look > especially at 6.1 - our preferred target right now. > That would be great. I would take care of 5.10 then. -- Philippe.