All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
To: "Manna, Animesh" <animesh.manna@intel.com>,
	"intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org"
	<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/3] drm/i915/pps: Enable 2nd pps for dual EDP scenario
Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2022 16:04:32 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87cz9w6x73.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <PH7PR11MB5981811EDDC0E92B460FF1AEF93E9@PH7PR11MB5981.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>

On Wed, 09 Nov 2022, "Manna, Animesh" <animesh.manna@intel.com> wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Nikula, Jani <jani.nikula@intel.com>
>> Sent: Wednesday, November 9, 2022 5:12 PM
>> To: Manna, Animesh <animesh.manna@intel.com>; intel-
>> gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
>> Cc: Manna, Animesh <animesh.manna@intel.com>; Ville Syrjälä
>> <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>; Shankar, Uma <uma.shankar@intel.com>
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] drm/i915/pps: Enable 2nd pps for dual EDP scenario
>>
>> On Wed, 09 Nov 2022, Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com> wrote:
>> > From display gen12 onwards to support dual EDP two instances of pps added.
>> > Currently backlight controller and pps instance can be mapped together
>> > for a specific panel. Currently dual PPS support is broken. This patch
>> > fixes it and enables for display 12+.
>> >
>> > v1: Iniital revision.
>> > v2: Called intel_bios_panel_init w/o PNPID before intel_pps_init.
>> > [Jani]
>> > v3: Set pps_id to -1 for pnpid type of panel which will be used by
>> > bxt_power_sequencer_idx() to set 2nd pps instance as default for 2nd
>> > EDP panel. [Jani]
>> > v4: Early return for PANEL_TYPE_FALLBACK. [Jani]
>> > v5: Removed additional pps_id variable and reused backlight
>> > controller. [Jani]
>> >
>> > Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
>> > Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
>> > Cc: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
>> > Signed-off-by: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com>
>> > ---
>> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c |  9 ++++++++-
>> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.h |  2 +-
>> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c   | 10 +++++++---
>> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.c  | 12 +++++++++++-
>> >  4 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c
>> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c
>> > index c2987f2c2b2e..1c1eea061fbb 100644
>> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c
>> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c
>> > @@ -3183,7 +3183,7 @@ void intel_bios_init(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
>> >     kfree(oprom_vbt);
>> >  }
>> >
>> > -void intel_bios_init_panel(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
>> > +bool intel_bios_init_panel(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
>> >                        struct intel_panel *panel,
>> >                        const struct intel_bios_encoder_data *devdata,
>> >                        const struct edid *edid)
>> > @@ -3192,6 +3192,11 @@ void intel_bios_init_panel(struct
>> > drm_i915_private *i915,
>> >
>> >     panel->vbt.panel_type = get_panel_type(i915, devdata, edid);
>> >
>> > +   if (panel->vbt.panel_type == PANEL_TYPE_FALLBACK && !edid) {
>>
>> As Ville pointed out, "panel->vbt.panel_type == PANEL_TYPE_FALLBACK" is
>> comparing apples to oranges, and we hit this path only in the rare case that
>> panel_type == 3, regardless of where the panel type originated.
>
> Got it, tried returning some random negative number (for example -2) from fallback_get_panel_type() and checking the same here is fixing the WARN_ON.
>
>>
>> This is probably the reason patches 1&2 don't fix the original issue like it should.
>>
>> I remind you that the issue is two eDP having their own pps software states but
>> using the same pps hardware due to conflicting pps index (which is the same as
>> panel->vbt.backlight.controller). This is what we need to solve here.
>
> In this patch we decide to use the specific pps based on port number. Once we identify it is PORT B always 2nd instance of PPS will be used. All pps register get instantiated with pps_idx 1
>         if (backlight_controller == -1) {
>                 /*
>                  * Use 2nd PPS instance as default for 2nd EDP panel.
>                  */
>                 if (connector->encoder->port == PORT_A)
>                         return 0;
>                 else
>                         return 1;
>         }
> Not sure what is toggling the VDD.

The 2nd eDP obviously!

BR,
Jani.


> Anyways I agree patch 3 is not
> needed. Thanks for review.
>
> Regards,
> Animesh
>
>>
>> We get the wakeref imbalance because of two eDP trampling on the same pps
>> hardware. Patch 3 does nothing to address that issue, it just tries to hide the
>> problem.
>>
>>
>> BR,
>> Jani.
>>
>>
>> > +           panel->vbt.backlight.controller = -1;
>> > +           return true;
>> > +   }
>> > +
>> >     parse_panel_options(i915, panel);
>> >     parse_generic_dtd(i915, panel);
>> >     parse_lfp_data(i915, panel);
>> > @@ -3203,6 +3208,8 @@ void intel_bios_init_panel(struct drm_i915_private
>> *i915,
>> >     parse_psr(i915, panel);
>> >     parse_mipi_config(i915, panel);
>> >     parse_mipi_sequence(i915, panel);
>> > +
>> > +   return false;
>> >  }
>> >
>> >  /**
>> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.h
>> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.h
>> > index e375405a7828..f8ef0274f3ee 100644
>> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.h
>> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.h
>> > @@ -232,7 +232,7 @@ struct mipi_pps_data {  } __packed;
>> >
>> >  void intel_bios_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv); -void
>> > intel_bios_init_panel(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>> > +bool intel_bios_init_panel(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>> >                        struct intel_panel *panel,
>> >                        const struct intel_bios_encoder_data *devdata,
>> >                        const struct edid *edid);
>> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
>> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
>> > index 7400d6b4c587..78cf3a77f026 100644
>> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
>> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
>> > @@ -5235,6 +5235,7 @@ static bool intel_edp_init_connector(struct intel_dp
>> *intel_dp,
>> >     struct intel_encoder *encoder = &dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp)->base;
>> >     bool has_dpcd;
>> >     struct edid *edid;
>> > +   bool retry;
>> >
>> >     if (!intel_dp_is_edp(intel_dp))
>> >             return true;
>> > @@ -5254,6 +5255,9 @@ static bool intel_edp_init_connector(struct intel_dp
>> *intel_dp,
>> >             return false;
>> >     }
>> >
>> > +   retry = intel_bios_init_panel(dev_priv, &intel_connector->panel,
>> > +                                 encoder->devdata, NULL);
>> > +
>> >     intel_pps_init(intel_dp);
>> >
>> >     /* Cache DPCD and EDID for edp. */
>> > @@ -5288,9 +5292,9 @@ static bool intel_edp_init_connector(struct intel_dp
>> *intel_dp,
>> >             edid = ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);
>> >     }
>> >     intel_connector->edid = edid;
>> > -
>> > -   intel_bios_init_panel(dev_priv, &intel_connector->panel,
>> > -                         encoder->devdata, IS_ERR(edid) ? NULL : edid);
>> > +   if (retry)
>> > +           intel_bios_init_panel(dev_priv, &intel_connector->panel,
>> > +                                 encoder->devdata, IS_ERR(edid) ? NULL :
>> edid);
>> >
>> >     intel_panel_add_edid_fixed_modes(intel_connector, true);
>> >
>> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.c
>> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.c
>> > index 3949fb449353..5738af154bd2 100644
>> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.c
>> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.c
>> > @@ -219,6 +219,16 @@ bxt_power_sequencer_idx(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>> >     /* We should never land here with regular DP ports */
>> >     drm_WARN_ON(&dev_priv->drm, !intel_dp_is_edp(intel_dp));
>> >
>> > +   if (backlight_controller == -1) {
>> > +           /*
>> > +            * Use 2nd PPS instance as default for 2nd EDP panel.
>> > +            */
>> > +           if (connector->encoder->port == PORT_A)
>> > +                   return 0;
>> > +           else
>> > +                   return 1;
>> > +   }
>> > +
>> >     if (!intel_dp->pps.pps_reset)
>> >             return backlight_controller;
>> >
>> > @@ -1430,7 +1440,7 @@ void intel_pps_init(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>> >     intel_dp->pps.initializing = true;
>> >     INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&intel_dp->pps.panel_vdd_work,
>> > edp_panel_vdd_work);
>> >
>> > -   if (IS_GEMINILAKE(i915) || IS_BROXTON(i915))
>> > +   if (IS_GEMINILAKE(i915) || IS_BROXTON(i915) || DISPLAY_VER(i915) >=
>> > +12)
>> >             intel_dp->get_pps_idx = bxt_power_sequencer_idx;
>> >     else if (IS_VALLEYVIEW(i915) || IS_CHERRYVIEW(i915))
>> >             intel_dp->get_pps_idx = vlv_power_sequencer_pipe;
>>
>> --
>> Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center

  reply	other threads:[~2022-11-09 14:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-11-09 11:15 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915/pps: Add get_pps_idx() hook as part of pps_get_register() cleanup Animesh Manna
2022-11-09 11:15 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/3] drm/i915/pps: Enable 2nd pps for dual EDP scenario Animesh Manna
2022-11-09 11:42   ` Jani Nikula
2022-11-09 13:54     ` Manna, Animesh
2022-11-09 14:04       ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2022-11-09 11:15 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915/edp: Fix warning as vdd went down without driver knowledge Animesh Manna
2022-11-09 11:46   ` Jani Nikula
2022-11-09 16:41 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for series starting with [1/3] drm/i915/pps: Add get_pps_idx() hook as part of pps_get_register() cleanup Patchwork
2022-11-09 17:05 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-11-08 21:18 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/3] " Animesh Manna
2022-11-08 21:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/3] drm/i915/pps: Enable 2nd pps for dual EDP scenario Animesh Manna
2022-11-09 10:11   ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-11-09 10:25     ` Jani Nikula
2022-11-09 10:29       ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-11-09 10:41         ` Jani Nikula
2022-11-09 11:09           ` Manna, Animesh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87cz9w6x73.fsf@intel.com \
    --to=jani.nikula@intel.com \
    --cc=animesh.manna@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.