From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 References: <20220517015318.697955-1-qiang1.zhang@intel.com> From: Philippe Gerum Subject: Re: [linux-dovetail][PATCH 0/3] Add TSC function supports and MFD driver for TGPIO Date: Thu, 19 May 2022 09:02:24 +0200 In-reply-to: Message-ID: <87czgagg35.fsf@xenomai.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain List-Id: Discussions about the Xenomai project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "Bezdeka, Florian" Cc: "qiang1.zhang@intel.com" , "jan.kiszka@siemens.com" , "xenomai@xenomai.org" "Bezdeka, Florian" writes: > On Tue, 2022-05-17 at 09:53 +0800, Zqiang via Xenomai wrote: >> The following modifications are mainly to add TSC function for TGPIO >> and add intel-ehl-gpio driver divides and initializes the PSE TGPIO >> resources. >> >> Christopher Hall (1): >> x86/tsc: Add TSC support functions to support ART driven Time-Aware >> GPIO >> >> D, Lakshmi Sowjanya (1): >> ptp: tgpio: PSE TGPIO crosststamp, counttstamp >> >> Raymond Tan (1): >> mfd: intel-ehl-gpio: Introduce MFD framework to PSE GPIO/TGPIO > > I haven't looked at the details yet and I missed the Community meeting > today where this topic might have been discussed. > > I'm asking myself if the dovetail tree is the right tree to take those > patches. Have these patches already been sent to upstream / Linux? If > so, we should fetch them within the next rebase cycle, right? > > If not: I feel we shouldn't apply them here and follow the "upstream > first" approach. > Agreed. -- Philippe.