All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com>,
	Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] PCI/MSI: Only mask all MSI-X entries when MSI-X is used
Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2021 11:17:28 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87czm3wimf.ffs@tglx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211210161025.3287927-1-sr@denx.de>

Stefan,

On Fri, Dec 10 2021 at 17:10, Stefan Roese wrote:
> I've debugged the MSI integration of the ZynqMP PCIe rootport driver
> (pcie-xilinx-nwl.c) and found no issues there. Also the MSI framework
> in the Kernel did not reveal any problems - at least for me. Looking
> a bit deeper into the lspci output, I found an interesting difference
> between v5.4 and v5.10 (or later).
>
> v5.4:
> 04:00.0 Non-Volatile memory controller: Marvell Technology Group Ltd. Device 1321 (rev 02) (prog-if 02 [NVM Express])
>         ...
> 	Capabilities: [50] MSI: Enable+ Count=1/1 Maskable+ 64bit+
> 		Address: 00000000fd480000  Data: 0004
> 		Masking: 00000000  Pending: 00000000
> 	Capabilities: [70] Express (v2) Endpoint, MSI 00
> 	...
> 	Capabilities: [b0] MSI-X: Enable- Count=67 Masked-
> 		Vector table: BAR=0 offset=00002000
> 		PBA: BAR=0 offset=00003000
> 	...
>
> v5.10:
> 04:00.0 Non-Volatile memory controller: Marvell Technology Group Ltd. Device 1321 (rev 02) (prog-if 02 [NVM Express])
>         ...
>         Capabilities: [50] MSI: Enable+ Count=1/1 Maskable+ 64bit+
>                 Address: 00000000fd480000  Data: 0004
>                 Masking: 00000000  Pending: 00000000
>         Capabilities: [70] Express (v2) Endpoint, MSI 00
>         ...
>         Capabilities: [b0] MSI-X: Enable- Count=67 Masked+
>                 Vector table: BAR=0 offset=00002000
>                 PBA: BAR=0 offset=00003000
>         ...
>
> So the only difference here being the "Masked+" compared to the
> "Masked-" in the working v5.4 Kernel. Testing in this area has shown,
> that the root cause for the masked bit being set was the call to
> msix_mask_all() in msix_capability_init(). Without this, all works just
> fine and the MSI interrupts are received again by the NVMe driver.

Not really. The Masked+ in the capabilities entry has nothing to do with
the entries in the table being masked. The Masked+ reflects the
PCI_MSIX_FLAGS_MASKALL bit in the MSI-X control register.

That is set early on and not cleared in the error handling path. The
error handling just clears the MSIX_FLAGS_ENABLE bit.

Can you try the patch below?

It might still be that this Marvell part really combines the per entry
mask bits from MSI-X with MSI, then we need both.

Thanks,

        tglx
---
--- a/drivers/pci/msi.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/msi.c
@@ -777,7 +777,7 @@ static int msix_capability_init(struct p
 	free_msi_irqs(dev);
 
 out_disable:
-	pci_msix_clear_and_set_ctrl(dev, PCI_MSIX_FLAGS_ENABLE, 0);
+	pci_msix_clear_and_set_ctrl(dev, PCI_MSIX_FLAGS_MASKALL | PCI_MSIX_FLAGS_ENABLE, 0);
 
 	return ret;
 }

  reply	other threads:[~2021-12-11 10:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-12-10 16:10 [RFC PATCH] PCI/MSI: Only mask all MSI-X entries when MSI-X is used Stefan Roese
2021-12-11 10:17 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2021-12-11 13:58   ` Stefan Roese
2021-12-11 21:02     ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-12-14 11:10       ` Stefan Roese
2021-12-14 12:28       ` [tip: irq/urgent] PCI/MSI: Clear PCI_MSIX_FLAGS_MASKALL on error tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2021-12-14 12:28 ` [tip: irq/urgent] PCI/MSI: Mask MSI-X vectors only on success tip-bot2 for Stefan Roese
2022-03-14 16:36   ` Jeremi Piotrowski
2022-03-14 16:49     ` Stefan Roese
2022-03-14 17:04       ` Dusty Mabe
2022-03-14 20:29         ` Jeremi Piotrowski
2022-04-27  7:59           ` Salvatore Bonaccorso
2022-04-27 17:35             ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-04-28 13:48               ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-04-28 13:50                 ` [PATCH] x86/pci/xen: Disable PCI/MSI[-X] masking for XEN_HVM guests Thomas Gleixner
2022-05-01  8:12                   ` [tip: x86/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2022-04-28 18:43                 ` [tip: irq/urgent] PCI/MSI: Mask MSI-X vectors only on success Salvatore Bonaccorso
2022-04-29  6:37                   ` Salvatore Bonaccorso

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87czm3wimf.ffs@tglx \
    --to=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marex@denx.de \
    --cc=michal.simek@xilinx.com \
    --cc=sr@denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.