From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Sender: List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Received: from lists.oasis-open.org (oasis-open.org [10.110.1.242]) by lists.oasis-open.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9FD698636E for ; Wed, 22 Sep 2021 11:28:27 +0000 (UTC) From: Cornelia Huck In-Reply-To: <20210903080303.39915-1-weijunji@bytedance.com> References: <20210903080303.39915-1-weijunji@bytedance.com> Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2021 13:28:12 +0200 Message-ID: <87czp0g88j.fsf@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: [virtio-dev] Re: [PATCH] Reserve device id for RDMA device Content-Type: text/plain To: Junji Wei , virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org Cc: weijunji@bytedance.com, dledford@redhat.com, jgg@ziepe.ca, mst@redhat.com, jasowang@redhat.com, yuval.shaia.ml@gmail.com, marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com, hare@suse.de, xieyongji@bytedance.com, chaiwen.cc@bytedance.com, dingtao.darren@bytedance.com, duanxiongchun@bytedance.com List-ID: On Fri, Sep 03 2021, Junji Wei wrote: > Use device ID 42 > > Signed-off-by: Junji Wei > --- > content.tex | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/content.tex b/content.tex > index 3aeb4a4..b57c997 100644 > --- a/content.tex > +++ b/content.tex > @@ -2878,6 +2878,8 @@ \chapter{Device Types}\label{sec:Device Types} > \hline > 41 & GPIO device \\ > \hline > +42 & RDMA device \\ > +\hline > \end{tabular} > > Some of the devices above are unspecified by this document, Do we have an answer to the issues raised with the QEMU patches? IOW, is it reasonable to expect that we can actually implement a usuable RDMA device? While device IDs are generally cheap, it would be good not to have too many dead entries. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: virtio-dev-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org For additional commands, e-mail: virtio-dev-help@lists.oasis-open.org