All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
To: Beata Michalska <beata.michalska@arm.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
	vincent.guittot@linaro.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
	corbet@lwn.net, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 2/3] sched/topology: Rework CPU capacity asymmetry detection
Date: Wed, 05 May 2021 19:17:39 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87czu5xcxo.mognet@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1619602363-1305-3-git-send-email-beata.michalska@arm.com>


Nitpicks ahead...

On 28/04/21 10:32, Beata Michalska wrote:
> @@ -1958,65 +1958,308 @@ static bool topology_span_sane(struct sched_domain_topology_level *tl,
>
>       return true;
>  }
> +/**
> + * Asym capacity bits
> + */
> +
> +/**
> + * Cached cpu masks for those sched domains, at a given topology level,
> + * that do represent CPUs with asymmetric capacities.
> + *
> + * Each topology level will get the cached data assigned,
> + * with asym cap sched_flags (SD_ASYM_CPUCAPACITY and SD_ASYM_CPUCAPACITY_FULL
> + * accordingly) and the corresponding cpumask for:
> + * - domains that do span CPUs with different capacities
> + * - domains where all CPU capacities are visible for all CPUs within
> + *   the domain
> + *
> + * Within a single topology level there might be domains
> + * with different scope of asymmetry:
> + *	none     -> .
> + *	partial  -> SD_ASYM_CPUCAPACITY
> + *	full     -> SD_ASYM_CPUCAPACITY|SD_ASYM_CPUCAPACITY_FULL
> + */
> +struct asym_cache_data {
> +
  ^
That should go

[...]

> -	if (!asym)
> -		return NULL;
> +	/* No asymmetry detected so skip the rest */
> +	if (!(cap_count > 1))
> +		goto leave;
> +
> +	if (!alloc_cpumask_var(&cpu_mask, GFP_KERNEL))
> +		goto leave;
>
> +	/* Get the number of topology levels */
> +	for_each_sd_topology(tl) level_count++;
>       /*
> -	 * Examine topology from all CPU's point of views to detect the lowest
> -	 * sched_domain_topology_level where a highest capacity CPU is visible
> -	 * to everyone.
> +	 * Allocate an array to store cached data per each topology level
>        */

That comment can be squashed into a single line.

> -	for_each_cpu(i, cpu_map) {
> -		unsigned long max_capacity = arch_scale_cpu_capacity(i);
> -		int tl_id = 0;
> +	scan_data = kcalloc(level_count, sizeof(*scan_data), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!scan_data) {
> +		free_cpumask_var(cpu_mask);
> +		goto leave;
> +	}
>
> -		for_each_sd_topology(tl) {
> -			if (tl_id < asym_level)
> -				goto next_level;
> +	level_count = 0;
> +
> +	for_each_sd_topology(tl) {
> +		unsigned int local_cap_count;
> +		bool full_asym = true;
> +		const struct cpumask *mask;
> +		struct asym_cache_data *data = &scan_data[level_count++];
>
> -			for_each_cpu_and(j, tl->mask(i), cpu_map) {
> -				unsigned long capacity;
> +#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
> +		/*
> +		 * For NUMA we might end-up in a sched domain that spans numa
> +		 * nodes with cpus with different capacities which would not be
> +		 * caught  by the above scan as those will have separate
                          ^
Stray whitespace >>>>>>>>>^

> +		 * cpumasks - subject to numa level
> +		 * @see: sched_domains_curr_level & sd_numa_mask
> +		 * Considered to be a no-go
> +		 */
> +		if (WARN_ON_ONCE(tl->numa_level && !full_asym))
> +			goto leave;
> +#endif
>
> -				capacity = arch_scale_cpu_capacity(j);
> +		if (asym_tl) {
> +			data->sched_flags = SD_ASYM_CPUCAPACITY |
> +					    SD_ASYM_CPUCAPACITY_FULL;
> +			continue;
> +		}
>
> -				if (capacity <= max_capacity)
> -					continue;
> +		cpumask_copy(cpu_mask, cpu_map);
> +		cpu = cpumask_first(cpu_mask);
> +
> +		while (cpu < nr_cpu_ids) {
> +			int i;
> +
> +			/*
> +			 * Tracking each CPU capacity 'scan' id to distinguish
> +			 * discovered capacity sets between different CPU masks
> +			 * at each topology level: capturing unique capacity
> +			 * values at each scan stage
> +			 */
> +			++scan_id;
> +			local_cap_count = 0;
>
> -				max_capacity = capacity;
> -				asym_level = tl_id;
> -				asym_tl = tl;
> +			mask = tl->mask(cpu);
> +			for_each_cpu_and(i, mask, cpu_map) {
> +
  ^
This should go.

> +				capacity = arch_scale_cpu_capacity(i);
> +
> +				list_for_each_entry(entry, &capacity_set, link) {
> +					if (entry->capacity == capacity &&
> +					    entry->scan_level < scan_id) {
> +						entry->scan_level = scan_id;
> +						++local_cap_count;
> +					}
> +				}
> +				__cpumask_clear_cpu(i, cpu_mask);
>                       }
> -next_level:
> -			tl_id++;
> +			if (cap_count != local_cap_count)
> +				full_asym = false;
> +			if (local_cap_count > 1) {
> +				int flags = (cap_count != local_cap_count)
> +					 ? SD_ASYM_CPUCAPACITY
> +					 : SD_ASYM_CPUCAPACITY
> +					 | SD_ASYM_CPUCAPACITY_FULL;

I haven't found many ternaries split over several lines, but those seem to
still follow the "operand at EOL" thing. The end result isn't particularly
pretty here (which is quite subjective, I know); another way to express
this would be:

                                int flags = SD_ASYM_CPUCAPACITY |
                                        SD_ASYM_CPUCAPACITY_FULL *
                                        (cap_count == local_cap_count);

which is... Meh.

  reply	other threads:[~2021-05-05 18:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-28  9:32 [RFC PATCH v2 0/3] Rework CPU capacity asymmetry detection Beata Michalska
2021-04-28  9:32 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/3] sched/core: Introduce SD_ASYM_CPUCAPACITY_FULL sched_domain flag Beata Michalska
2021-04-28  9:32 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/3] sched/topology: Rework CPU capacity asymmetry detection Beata Michalska
2021-05-05 18:17   ` Valentin Schneider [this message]
2021-04-28  9:32 ` [RFC PATCH v2 3/3] sched/doc: Update the CPU capacity asymmetry bits Beata Michalska
2021-04-28 17:19   ` Randy Dunlap
2021-05-10 16:33     ` Beata Michalska
2021-05-05 18:17 ` [RFC PATCH v2 0/3] Rework CPU capacity asymmetry detection Valentin Schneider

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87czu5xcxo.mognet@arm.com \
    --to=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
    --cc=beata.michalska@arm.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.