From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Florian Weimer Subject: Re: extending wait4(2) or waitid(2) linux syscall Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2018 16:18:40 +0100 Message-ID: <87d0qrooj3.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> References: <20170420152051.568f2050.albert.aribaud@3adev.fr> <20181115140441.GA2171@altlinux.org> <20181115153008.GC2171@altlinux.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-alpha-owner@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: (Arnd Bergmann's message of "Fri, 16 Nov 2018 17:50:14 -0800") To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: "Dmitry V. Levin" , Albert ARIBAUD , "H. Peter Anvin" , GNU C Library , Linux API List-Id: linux-api@vger.kernel.org * Arnd Bergmann: > On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 7:30 AM Dmitry V. Levin wrote: >> On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 06:39:03AM -0800, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >> > On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 6:05 AM Dmitry V. Levin wrote: >> > > On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 03:20:51PM +0200, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: >> >> 1. strace needs a race-free invocation of wait4(2) or waitid(2) >> with a different signal mask, this cannot be achieved without >> an extended version of syscall, similar to pselect6(2) extension >> over select(2) and ppoll(2) extension over poll(2). >> >> Signal mask specification in linux requires two parameters: >> "const sigset_t *sigmask" and "size_t sigsetsize". >> Creating pwait6(2) as an extension of wait4(2) with two arguments >> is straightforward. >> Creating pwaitid(2) as an extension of waitid(2) that already has 5 >> arguments would require an indirection similar to pselect6(2). > > Getting back to this point: you could also do the same thing with > the CLONE_FD approach from Josh Triplett[1] or Casey Dahlin's > older waitfd() syscall, correct? A descriptor-based solution would not be useful to glibc because applications assume that glibc does not (persistently) open any file descriptors behind t heir back. Thanks, Florian